Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v543k2$376u3$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v543k2$376u3$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0
 ---Boilerplate Reply
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:44:18 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 86
Message-ID: <v543k2$376u3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v50o2t$2fh98$2@dont-email.me>
 <v51dc8$2jmrd$1@dont-email.me> <v53b0s$324b4$1@dont-email.me>
 <v53tjm$35vak$1@dont-email.me> <v5415i$lkkc$1@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:44:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d3e479354f6c59f79625e93d556f5bfb";
	logging-data="3382211"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+K9VQJPq19PIQ1nyL46Uek"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3KC8RJncTZ7cMoTAdKR4VF5aJwI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v5415i$lkkc$1@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 4591

On 6/21/2024 9:02 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/21/24 9:01 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/21/2024 2:44 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 20.jun.2024 om 16:12 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 6/20/2024 3:09 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 20.jun.2024 om 02:00 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> This shows all of the steps of HH0 simulating DDD
>>>>>> calling a simulated HH0 simulating DDD
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://liarparadox.org/HH0_(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf
>>>>>> *Some of the key instructions are color coded*
>>>>>> GREEN---DebugStep Address
>>>>>> RED-----HH Address
>>>>>> YELLOW--All of the DDD instructions
>>>>>> CYAN----Return from DebugStep to Decide_Halting_HH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>>> [000020a2] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [000020a3] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [000020a5] 68a2200000 push 000020a2 ; push DDD
>>>>>> [000020aa] e8f3f9ffff call 00001aa2 ; call H0
>>>>>> [000020af] 83c404     add esp,+04   ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [000020b2] 5d         pop ebp       ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [000020b3] c3         ret           ; never gets here
>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [000020b3]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly which step of DDD emulated by H0 was emulated
>>>>>> incorrectly such that this emulation would be complete?
>>>>>> AKA DDD emulated by H0 reaches machine address [000020b3]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If the simulation of a program with a loop of 5 iterations is 
>>>>> aborted after 3 iterations, all instructions are correctly 
>>>>> simulated. Nevertheless, it is an incorrect simulation, because it 
>>>>> should simulate up to the final state of the program.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It would be helpful if you answer the actual question being asked
>>>> right here and thus not answer some other question that was asked
>>>> somewhere else.
>>>
>>> If you do not understand that I answered the question why the 
>>> simulation is incorrect, it is hopeless. The question which 
>>> instruction is incorrect is not the right question.
>>>
>>
>> If you say that something is incorrect and can't be specific
>> then your rebuttal is pure bluster with no actual basis.
>>
>> You need to show every single freaking step of exactly
>> DDD correctly emulated by HH0 reaches past its own
>> machine address [0000209b] or all you have is BULLSHIT!
>>
> 
> Which proves your duplicity, since no one is claiming that.
>

If you claim that I have made a mistake and cannot point
to the exact details of this mistake then everyone will
know that you are lying about there being any actual mistake.


You need to show every single freaking step of exactly
DDD correctly emulated by HH0 reaches past its own
machine address [0000209b] or all you have is BULLSHIT!

_DDD()
[00002093] 55               push ebp
[00002094] 8bec             mov ebp,esp
[00002096] 6893200000       push 00002093 ; push DDD
[0000209b] e853f4ffff       call 000014f3 ; call HH0
[000020a0] 83c404           add esp,+04
[000020a3] 5d               pop ebp
[000020a4] c3               ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [000020a4]

Maybe I need to make that my boilerplate reply to
everything that you ever say about anything until
you admit that you are wrong.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer