Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v5522g$3ctng$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho Subject: Re: Doctor Who Space Babies review with spoilers Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 20:38:08 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <v1sqid$3dnka$2@dont-email.me> References: <v1ogpq$2etg$4@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v1oh8i$272u8$1@dont-email.me> <v1ohcm$2etg$14@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v1oi3e$278o6$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 12:38:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="85386f073e28b85b23a7c3c258c5e49f"; logging-data="3595914"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19a2CV96WAZyfVDvPM7Fib6qoSeT2cPhqk=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:eXGDlilu3LwjvZGMSYHApzne3MQ= In-Reply-To: <v1oi3e$278o6$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2585 The Last Doctor wrote on 12/5/24 5:49 am: > The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: >> In article <v1oh8i$272u8$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor >> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote: >>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This >>> is a lie Dave, isn’t it? You didn’t write this. It’s AI >>> generated spaff. >>> >>> It’s full of errors (which is a bit like you) but is coherent >>> and grammatically correct (which is not at all like you). And it >>> spots lots of things that you never would. >> >> You hate changes of style? > > I love changes of style. But if you wrote one of your usual > incoherent point-by-points, I doubt CoPilot or whatever you used > would be able to polish your turd that far. I’d be delighted to be > proved wrong - care to post what you fed into the AI engine so we can > see? > > You’ve not written anything that coherent in this group - ever. And > it’s packed solidly with tells that it’s an AI composited screed. > >>>> 6/10 >>> >>> Is that your rating, or is the AI a bigger fanboi than you? >> >> Mine, so what is yours? > > I’ll give my thoughts in due course. And I won’t run them through an > AI bot. It’s fine if you need that crutch. But you really should > acknowledge that it’s by no means your own work. > It would certainly be the CHRISTIAN thing to do if the work wasn't his own!! -- Daniel