Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v5522g$3ctng$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: Doctor Who Space Babies review with spoilers
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 20:38:08 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <v1sqid$3dnka$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v1ogpq$2etg$4@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v1oh8i$272u8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1ohcm$2etg$14@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v1oi3e$278o6$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 12:38:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="85386f073e28b85b23a7c3c258c5e49f";
	logging-data="3595914"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19a2CV96WAZyfVDvPM7Fib6qoSeT2cPhqk="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eXGDlilu3LwjvZGMSYHApzne3MQ=
In-Reply-To: <v1oi3e$278o6$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2585

The Last Doctor wrote on 12/5/24 5:49 am:
> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <v1oh8i$272u8$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This
>>> is a lie Dave, isn’t it? You didn’t write this. It’s AI
>>> generated spaff.
>>> 
>>> It’s full of errors (which is a bit like you) but is coherent
>>> and grammatically correct (which is not at all like you). And it
>>> spots lots of things that you never would.
>> 
>> You hate changes of style?
> 
> I love changes of style. But if you wrote one of your usual
> incoherent point-by-points, I doubt CoPilot or whatever you used
> would be able to polish your turd that far. I’d be delighted to be
> proved wrong - care to post what you fed into the AI engine so we can
> see?
> 
> You’ve not written anything that coherent in this group - ever. And
> it’s packed solidly with tells that it’s an AI composited screed.
> 
>>>> 6/10
>>> 
>>> Is that your rating, or is the AI a bigger fanboi than you?
>> 
>> Mine, so what is yours?
> 
> I’ll give my thoughts in due course. And I won’t run them through an
> AI bot. It’s fine if you need that crutch. But you really should
> acknowledge that it’s by no means your own work.
> 
It would certainly be the CHRISTIAN thing to do if the work wasn't his own!!
-- 
Daniel