Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: Speaking of long-ish passwords
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:12:25 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <v55mfq$3k3g4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <FKXcO.332464$ujOb.302447@fx16.ams4>
 <v51jpr$2kvgs$2@dont-email.me> <qe5dO.139761$2RJ6.85607@fx05.ams4>
 <v52np1$2uvck$2@dont-email.me> <VD5dO.139762$2RJ6.117477@fx05.ams4>
 <v52t0l$3022a$1@dont-email.me> <jzjdO.86399$bHO6.65183@fx06.ams4>
 <v54t85$3bqij$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 07:12:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c9aa14242d2d06aad33f22c5cc4d9ef7";
	logging-data="3804676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CjcGL0NPE2PFbXISYMRZkZgR87vLejlk="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:p9l3Dund6BWJGnkWSUMu4MkBy+s=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v54t85$3bqij$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2199

On 6/21/2024 3:01 PM, Rich wrote:
> Cri-Cri <cri@cri.cri.invalid> wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 20:45:24 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
> Chris very much so likes to "insert" his hmac cipher into every
> discussion thread, even those where it is off topic (although the
> off-topicness is questionable here....).
> 
> He did this so much that Richard Heathfield killfiled him a couple
> years back after having become frustrated with his "insertions" (among
> other things).
> 
> It is best to just ignore his off-topic insertion of quasi-advertising
> of his hmac cipher into every thread.  If this becomes too much,
> there is always the killfile method of ignoring the posts.

I was just thinking of how to create a complex password from a simple 
password. My work came to mind, however, it does not work because it 
creates a new ciphertext for every encryption. So, that sucks for the 
task at hand.