Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v56brs$3nt71$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: And the clocks are adjustable Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 14:17:16 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 11 Message-ID: <v56brs$3nt71$1@dont-email.me> References: <01e388e0cf7844f9ca20c3842c24db91@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 13:17:16 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="08b80219fbe473a6bd81d41172c44e72"; logging-data="3929313"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18RvKVVxtPH66heViTJcLeo" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:czASPNDQpme3YT0GEZ1vNNzmTss= Bytes: 1191 On 2024-06-21 18:14:07 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said: > It hasn't occurred to the relativists to calibrate them. Time itself > must dilate! Some clocks are adjustable, some are not. In particular, a cesium clock needn't as it directly implements the definition of second. -- Mikko