Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D)
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:39:48 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <v575pl$3sg5p$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v45tec$4q15$1@dont-email.me> <v4g65a$3tn6q$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4g6vr$2ic0g$1@dont-email.me> <v4gc0b$3tn6r$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v4gcjc$2msea$1@dont-email.me> <v4geab$3tn6r$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v4gg0s$2nim8$2@dont-email.me> <v4ha63$3v16r$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v4hfq9$2sdqr$5@dont-email.me> <v4hp3r$3viml$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4hv85$3021v$1@dont-email.me> <v4ju8f$222a$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v4k1m4$3f99u$1@dont-email.me> <v4k4mt$3fnqu$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4maeo$3vv3f$1@dont-email.me> <v4mnim$1qt6$6@dont-email.me>
 <v4onga$hjo3$3@dont-email.me> <v4pbg4$ln46$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4rdtp$18al3$1@dont-email.me> <v4rvil$1boeu$2@dont-email.me>
 <v4s9hj$1dnm7$1@dont-email.me> <v4sa0h$1dk9i$3@dont-email.me>
 <v4sci6$1ebce$1@dont-email.me> <v4sd35$1eb2f$5@dont-email.me>
 <v4u3jl$1se49$1@dont-email.me> <v4umvh$1vpm0$7@dont-email.me>
 <v50d8k$2e51s$1@dont-email.me> <v50dtp$2e5ij$1@dont-email.me>
 <v51f4t$2k8ar$1@dont-email.me> <v51ge4$2kbbe$2@dont-email.me>
 <v539bk$329sv$1@dont-email.me> <v53upb$35vak$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:39:50 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1e01ab324d9c33c6c7fdf928f339ec58";
	logging-data="4079801"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+jjDPlijEZUFX4mgEK18T5"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WaluBqy9Zmem2NsDsSMJglgSwzY=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <v53upb$35vak$6@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3476

Op 21.jun.2024 om 15:21 schreef olcott:
> On 6/21/2024 2:16 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-06-20 15:04:35 +0000, olcott said:
>>
>>> On 6/20/2024 9:42 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-06-20 05:15:37 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 6/20/2024 12:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Sitll inclear whether you know what "termination analyzer" means.
>>>>
>>>>> I really don't care what you believe.
>>>>> It is not about belief.
>>>>> It is about correct reasoning.
>>>>
>>>> No, it is not. It is about language maintenance. If you cannot present
>>>> your reasoning in Common Language it does not matter whether your
>>>> reasoning is correct.
>>>
>>> I cannot possibly present my reasoning in a convincing way
>>> to people that have already made up their mind and closed it
>>> thus fail to trace through each step of this reasoning looking
>>> for an error and finding none.
>>
>> If you can't convince the reviewers of a journal that your article is
>> well thought and well written you cannot get it published in a
>> respected journal.
>>
> 
> The trick is to get people that say I am wrong
> to point out the exact mistake. When they really
> try to do this they find no mistake and all of
> their rebbutal was pure bluster with no actual basis.
> 

It seems you do not even try to answer questions to show errors in the 
reasoning of your opponents, in order to protect yourself against 
finding no errors in their rebuttal.