Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Can you please verify that the analysis of these C functions is
 correct?
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:17:37 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <v5780h$3t1bd$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v4obkj$f9p5$2@dont-email.me>
 <v4pg5p$morv$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v54s1p$3boc5$1@dont-email.me> <v5684p$3n50u$1@dont-email.me>
 <v56gs1$3olbi$3@dont-email.me> <v56lar$onl4$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v56uij$3rako$1@dont-email.me>
 <v573d1$3s8q3$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:17:38 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c9aa14242d2d06aad33f22c5cc4d9ef7";
	logging-data="4097389"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19djfNa5Ex3DMe3OdK0TWjg0gnOSDGVaZw="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sdnnuY8vwu9HqbHpNB+YcDSIpNc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v573d1$3s8q3$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
Bytes: 1923

On 6/22/2024 10:58 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 22.06.2024 um 18:36 schrieb olcott:
> 
>> It seems pretty stupid to allow gaps in the semantics of C++ programs. 
>> Simply specify that the order of evaluation is left to right unless:
>> (a) Otherwise specified such as operator precedence rules.
>> (b) Derives the same result as left to right ordering.
> 
> Most UB is there to allow optimizations, also in this case.
> I've got no problem with that.
> 
> 

Humm. Sounds reasonable. UB is there to be defined by a non-conforming 
compiler? ;^)