Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts?
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:59:53 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <v57ohp$5d7$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v56n8h$3pr25$1@dont-email.me> <v56ntj$onl3$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v56ps2$3q4ea$1@dont-email.me> <v56sk3$p1du$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v56tfv$3ql1v$2@dont-email.me> <v570n5$onl4$11@i2pn2.org>
 <v571lc$3rrgk$1@dont-email.me> <v57603$onl3$12@i2pn2.org>
 <v576cg$3soh6$2@dont-email.me> <v576nv$onl3$14@i2pn2.org>
 <v5775h$3soh6$5@dont-email.me> <v57837$onl3$15@i2pn2.org>
 <v5792v$3t97b$1@dont-email.me> <v579gn$onl3$17@i2pn2.org>
 <v579rg$3t97b$3@dont-email.me> <v57b01$onl3$18@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 01:59:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f19a017657c3e3f4d15756f16e311b4d";
	logging-data="5543"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19GQsz868DLFHrRLgL6eOmc"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7DSa4Bmrj+TSEbKuX8xJKtJtLDw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v57b01$onl3$18@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 2486

On 6/22/2024 3:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/22/24 3:49 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/22/2024 2:43 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/22/24 3:35 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The correct measure of the behavior of the actual input is DDD
>>>> correctly simulated by H0 according to the definition of the
>>>> semantics of the x86 programming language.
>>>
>>> FROM WHERE?
>>>
>>> That is just YOUR LIE!!!!!
>>>
>>
>> Now you are trying to get away with disbelieving in the
>> semantics of the x86 language and you can't even spell "from"
>>
>> That you have the audacity to call me a liar over this
>> might condemn you to Hell (I sincerely hope not).
>>
> 
> I call it a lie, because it IS one.
> 
> You claim a definition of the "Correct Answer" that has NO source but 
> your own ignorant mind. That makes it a LIE, as there is a DIFFERENT 
> definition that you refuse to use.
> 
> You claim you can show "behavior" by the definition of the x86 assembly 
> language that is not there.
> 

Liar