Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v5876v$5t9j$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Duff <jim@bad.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: syslog setup
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:10:07 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <v5876v$5t9j$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v4cp7a$1pet4$1@dont-email.me> <v4cvnf$1qm70$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4d1gh$1r26g$1@dont-email.me> <v4q8he$u3f8$1@dont-email.me>
 <2ef65812-45fb-bb91-6ac2-2cfbdcceb1de@gmail.com>
 <v4uhn1$1v7ke$1@dont-email.me> <v4ujel$1s53r$2@dont-email.me>
 <v53r5b$35kl2$1@dont-email.me> <v550js$3cc3a$1@dont-email.me>
 <v571c2$3ru2d$1@dont-email.me> <v57hbe$3uebj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v57kdk$3vfuj$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 06:10:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d14c2445a8009dc9cd77979559dbd57b";
	logging-data="193843"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wtegQhFDnGwUrBf08SU4S"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rFm9AR4YCskma8gazx6OGAZPJwE=
In-Reply-To: <v57kdk$3vfuj$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2732

On 23/6/24 08:49, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 6/22/2024 5:57 PM, Jim Duff wrote:
>> On 23/6/24 03:23, Paul Coviello wrote:
>>> Jim Duff wrote:
>>>> [Massive snip]
>>> hmmm what was I expecting!  well it seemed pretty straight forward in 
>>> the PDF that you set it up as it says and it just works, now after 
>>> reading your comments there might be more I have to do.
>>>
>>> I'll try it on Monday.
>>>
>>> and the logger test message does work. just trying to get OPCOM to 
>>> connect to it and hopefully your suggestions above I can figure it out
>>
>> When you say "just trying to get OPCOM to connect to it" are you 
>> expecting that syslogd will somehow intercept your OPCOM messages and 
>> log them somewhere else?  Because it doesn't do that.
>>
>> It takes syslog messages that match the priorities you have assigned 
>> to forward to OPCOM, in this case local1.err, and does exactly that, 
>> as I demonstrated in the example.
> 
> But if one want to send OPCOM messages to syslog then I assume one could:
> * enable terminal as operator terminal
> * run a little utility program that trap broadcasts
>    and send them to syslog
> ?
> 
> Arne
> 

Sure, why not?

https://www.eight-cubed.com/downloads.html#catch_opcom

will trap the OPCOM messages, and it's a simple matter to open a 
datagram socket and write to the syslog port.

Jim.
-- 
eight-cubed.com