Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 20:00:59 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <v5aggb$jan3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v598l4$c4if$1@dont-email.me> <v59p13$smd5$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v5a4qc$h08n$1@dont-email.me> <v5a5a1$smd5$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v5a657$hgsg$1@dont-email.me> <v5a7vs$smd4$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v5a8hi$hsjd$1@dont-email.me> <v5a9bi$smd4$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v5abdl$igvh$1@dont-email.me> <v5ac1p$smd4$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v5add4$isal$1@dont-email.me> <v5aebe$smd4$5@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 03:00:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="30c92b316077fe98558b44dd129a1438";
	logging-data="633571"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mNiDrB9UopHJONIdzYKfu"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O4gpmWCdpMtchikuQ5+lc+UzfYE=
In-Reply-To: <v5aebe$smd4$5@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3418

On 6/23/2024 7:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/23/24 8:08 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/23/2024 6:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/23/24 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/23/2024 5:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/23/24 6:45 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You know what the freak I was talking from prior
>>>>>> discussions unless your brain is so damaged that
>>>>>> you can't remember anything from one post to the next.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the case that you affirm that your brain <is>
>>>>>> this damaged then I humbly apologize.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, you don't know what you are talking about.
>>>>>
>>>> So you insist on lying about this verified fact?
>>>>
>>>> _DDD()
>>>> [00002172] 55               push ebp
>>>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp
>>>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
>>>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>>>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>>>> [00002183] c3               ret
>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>
>>>> According to the semantics of the x86 programming language
>>>> when DDD correctly emulated by H0 calls H0(DDD) this call
>>>> cannot possibly return.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I won't say it can't be true, but it hasn't been proven, largely 
>>> because it seems you don't know how to do a formal logic proof.
>>>
>>
>> Liar
>>
> 
> Then where is the proof?
> 
> And were is the simulation that H0 did?
> 
> Failure to show where you ACTUALLY PROVED it just shows you a liar.
> 
> Remember the parts of a Formal Logic Proof:
> 

You could disagree that 2 + 3 = 5 on this same Jackass basis.
2 + 3 = 5 ON THE FREAKING BASIS OF THE SEMANTICS OF ARITHMETIC.

According to the semantics of the x86 programming language
when DDD correctly emulated by H0 calls H0(DDD) this call
cannot possibly return.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer