Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie?
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 20:20:11 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 126
Message-ID: <v5ahkc$jgfe$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v598l4$c4if$1@dont-email.me> <v59p13$smd5$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v5a4qc$h08n$1@dont-email.me> <v5a5a1$smd5$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v5a657$hgsg$1@dont-email.me> <v5a7vs$smd4$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v5a8hi$hsjd$1@dont-email.me> <v5a9bi$smd4$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v5abdl$igvh$1@dont-email.me> <v5ac1p$smd4$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v5add4$isal$1@dont-email.me> <v5aebe$smd4$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v5aggb$jan3$1@dont-email.me> <v5ah6u$smd5$7@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 03:20:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="30c92b316077fe98558b44dd129a1438";
	logging-data="639470"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9Bv9gcdFn4BOyBq86/EcD"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q5BHuoP10j7hXim27tTvDZtpKRY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v5ah6u$smd5$7@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 5439

On 6/23/2024 8:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/23/24 9:00 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/23/2024 7:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/23/24 8:08 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/23/2024 6:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/23/24 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/23/2024 5:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/23/24 6:45 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You know what the freak I was talking from prior
>>>>>>>> discussions unless your brain is so damaged that
>>>>>>>> you can't remember anything from one post to the next.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the case that you affirm that your brain <is>
>>>>>>>> this damaged then I humbly apologize.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, you don't know what you are talking about.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you insist on lying about this verified fact?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>>> [00002172] 55               push ebp
>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp
>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>>>>>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>>>>>> [00002183] c3               ret
>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to the semantics of the x86 programming language
>>>>>> when DDD correctly emulated by H0 calls H0(DDD) this call
>>>>>> cannot possibly return.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I won't say it can't be true, but it hasn't been proven, largely 
>>>>> because it seems you don't know how to do a formal logic proof.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Liar
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then where is the proof?
>>>
>>> And were is the simulation that H0 did?
>>>
>>> Failure to show where you ACTUALLY PROVED it just shows you a liar.
>>>
>>> Remember the parts of a Formal Logic Proof:
>>>
>>
>> You could disagree that 2 + 3 = 5 on this same Jackass basis.
>> 2 + 3 = 5 ON THE FREAKING BASIS OF THE SEMANTICS OF ARITHMETIC.
> 
> But I seen proofs that 2 + 3 = 5
> 
> And that is done on a proof that uses the semantics of aritmetic.
> 
> The phrase "Semantics of Arithmetic" though, is not a proof.
> 
>>
>> According to the semantics of the x86 programming language
>> when DDD correctly emulated by H0 calls H0(DDD) this call
>> cannot possibly return.
>>
> 
> Then try to prove it.
> 

I will not try any prove that 2 + 3 = 5, if you deny
it then you are a liar.

Likewise for the behavior of DDD correctly simulated
by H0. A correct x86 emulator already proved this three
years ago and you still try and get away with lying about it.

We have gotten it down to this ONLY LIARS WILL DISAGREE
THAT MY PROOF IS CORRECT.

DDD correctly emulated by H0 DOES NOT HALT.
Likewise for P correctly emulated by H.

typedef int (*ptr2)();
int H(ptr2 P, ptr2 I);

int P(ptr2 x)
{
   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}

int main()
{
   H(P,P);
}

_P()
[000020e2] 55               push ebp         ; housekeeping
[000020e3] 8bec             mov ebp,esp      ; housekeeping
[000020e5] 51               push ecx         ; housekeeping
[000020e6] 8b4508           mov eax,[ebp+08] ; parameter
[000020e9] 50               push eax         ; push parameter
[000020ea] 8b4d08           mov ecx,[ebp+08] ; parameter
[000020ed] 51               push ecx         ; push parameter
[000020ee] e82ff3ffff       call 00001422    ; call H(P,P)
[000020f3] 83c408           add esp,+08
[000020f6] 8945fc           mov [ebp-04],eax
[000020f9] 837dfc00         cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[000020fd] 7402             jz 00002101
[000020ff] ebfe             jmp 000020ff
[00002101] 8b45fc           mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002104] 8be5             mov esp,ebp
[00002106] 5d               pop ebp
[00002107] c3               ret
Size in bytes:(0038) [00002107]



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer