Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v5btf3$v0vb$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: 195 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HH0 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:48:19 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 51 Message-ID: <v5btf3$v0vb$4@dont-email.me> References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v58m12$8mmo$1@dont-email.me> <v59797$brmn$1@dont-email.me> <v5b7nv$qvrb$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:48:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="30c92b316077fe98558b44dd129a1438"; logging-data="1016811"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/72aBWRPEi7YtlUlQ8TgL+" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:FPXgERlCuDUlAnDSGTYIok5nxMQ= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v5b7nv$qvrb$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3126 On 6/24/2024 2:37 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-06-23 13:17:27 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 6/23/2024 3:22 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> The subject line is not quite correct. The execution trace is not >>> 195 pages long, only 159 pages. In the beginning of the file there >>> is other material, mainly several disaasembled functions, many of >>> which do nothing. >>> >>> Several points in the trace are incorrect. >>> >>> On 2024-06-20 00:00:48 +0000, olcott said: >>> >>>> This shows all of the steps of HH0 simulating DDD >>>> calling a simulated HH0 simulating DDD >>>> >>>> https://liarparadox.org/HH0_(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf >>>> *Some of the key instructions are color coded* >>>> GREEN---DebugStep Address >>>> RED-----HH Address >>>> YELLOW--All of the DDD instructions >>>> CYAN----Return from DebugStep to Decide_Halting_HH >>>> >>>> _DDD() >>>> [000020a2] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>> [000020a3] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>> [000020a5] 68a2200000 push 000020a2 ; push DDD >>>> [000020aa] e8f3f9ffff call 00001aa2 ; call H0 >>>> [000020af] 83c404 add esp,+04 ; housekeeping >>>> [000020b2] 5d pop ebp ; housekeeping >>>> [000020b3] c3 ret ; never gets here >>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [000020b3] >>> >>> That code is not from the mentined trace file. In that file _DDD() >>> is at the addresses 2093..20a4. According to the trace no instruction >>> at the address is executed (because that address points to the last byte >>> of a three byte instruction. >> >> In order to make my examples I must edit the code >> and this changes the addresses of some functions. > > Why do you need to make an example when you already have one > in the file mentioned in the subject line? > I had to make a few more examples such as HH1(DD,DD) -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer