Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:34:44 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 107
Message-ID: <v5d3b4$16k7k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v598l4$c4if$1@dont-email.me> <v59p13$smd5$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v5a4qc$h08n$1@dont-email.me> <v5a5a1$smd5$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v5a657$hgsg$1@dont-email.me> <v5a7vs$smd4$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v5a8hi$hsjd$1@dont-email.me> <v5a9bi$smd4$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v5abdl$igvh$1@dont-email.me> <v5ac1p$smd4$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v5add4$isal$1@dont-email.me> <v5aebe$smd4$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v5aggb$jan3$1@dont-email.me> <v5ah6u$smd5$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v5ahkc$jgfe$1@dont-email.me> <v5ai8i$smd5$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v5aij8$nd1b$2@dont-email.me> <v5ajva$smd4$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v5akga$nr6u$1@dont-email.me> <v5aktu$smd4$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v5alis$o08r$1@dont-email.me> <v5alpo$smd5$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v5am7l$o31i$1@dont-email.me> <v5an1e$o6ib$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5ao4p$smd4$10@i2pn2.org> <v5ap10$odqa$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5bjn9$ursa$1@i2pn2.org> <v5bt3m$v0vb$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5cuta$10m6o$2@i2pn2.org> <v5d0bf$162m0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5d188$10m6p$6@i2pn2.org> <v5d1ev$16a8b$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5d1mm$10m6o$8@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 02:34:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="422dd2162c45ab1a09b084523bb5ca66";
	logging-data="1265908"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HXWfIAAMevrvaxaJSAvCc"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:c3eMf0g0MNSS6iqARovGK/cOq7g=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v5d1mm$10m6o$8@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 6086

On 6/24/2024 7:06 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/24/24 8:02 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/24/2024 6:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/24/24 7:43 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/24/2024 6:19 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/24/24 9:42 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/24/2024 6:02 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/23/24 11:26 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/23/2024 10:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/23/24 10:52 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for the next 10,000 messages if you really want to look
>>>>>>>> foolish that long.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Go ahead, stall your argument till you die.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no sense moving on to the next point until AFTER
>>>>>> you quit lying about this point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _P()
>>>>>> [000020e2] 55               push ebp         ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [000020e3] 8bec             mov ebp,esp      ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [000020e5] 51               push ecx         ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [000020e6] 8b4508           mov eax,[ebp+08] ; parameter
>>>>>> [000020e9] 50               push eax         ; push parameter
>>>>>> [000020ea] 8b4d08           mov ecx,[ebp+08] ; parameter
>>>>>> [000020ed] 51               push ecx         ; push parameter
>>>>>> [000020ee] e82ff3ffff       call 00001422    ; call H(P,P)
>>>>>> [000020f3] 83c408           add esp,+08
>>>>>> [000020f6] 8945fc           mov [ebp-04],eax
>>>>>> [000020f9] 837dfc00         cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
>>>>>> [000020fd] 7402             jz 00002101
>>>>>> [000020ff] ebfe             jmp 000020ff
>>>>>> [00002101] 8b45fc           mov eax,[ebp-04]
>>>>>> [00002104] 8be5             mov esp,ebp
>>>>>> [00002106] 5d               pop ebp
>>>>>> [00002107] c3               ret
>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0038) [00002107]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The call from P to H(P,P) when P is correctly emulated
>>>>>> by H cannot possibly return.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And my reply, like always, So?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since you are such a damned liar I am not going to give
>>>> you two different points to endlessly switch back and forth
>>>> between. I am going to keep repeating this point to prove
>>>> what a damned liar you really are.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What is the LIE?
>>>
>>> It seems YOU are the LIAR.
>>>
>>>> void DDD()
>>>> {
>>>>    H0(DDD);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> _DDD()
>>>> [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
>>>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>>>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>>>> [00002183] c3               ret
>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>
>>>> The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated
>>>> by H0 cannot possibly return.
>>>>
>>>> Once we have closure on this point we can move on to
>>>> the last point.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And what do we care about it?
>>>
>>
>> *It is the only thing that you will get to talk to me about*
>> *It is the only thing that you will get to talk to me about*
>> *It is the only thing that you will get to talk to me about*
>> *It is the only thing that you will get to talk to me about*
>>
> 
> Good, so you are admitting you have nothing important to say.

I do correctly refute the halting problem proofs and
mandate mutual agreement on each step before I will
proceed to the next step.

*I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
*I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
*I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer