Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure
 (typo)
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:07:04 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <v5d57o$16ra5$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v598l4$c4if$1@dont-email.me> <v5a4qc$h08n$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5a5a1$smd5$6@i2pn2.org> <v5a657$hgsg$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5a7vs$smd4$2@i2pn2.org> <v5a8hi$hsjd$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5a9bi$smd4$3@i2pn2.org> <v5abdl$igvh$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5ac1p$smd4$4@i2pn2.org> <v5add4$isal$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5aebe$smd4$5@i2pn2.org> <v5aggb$jan3$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5ah6u$smd5$7@i2pn2.org> <v5ahkc$jgfe$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5ai8i$smd5$8@i2pn2.org> <v5aij8$nd1b$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5ajva$smd4$6@i2pn2.org> <v5akga$nr6u$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5aktu$smd4$8@i2pn2.org> <v5alis$o08r$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5alpo$smd5$10@i2pn2.org> <v5am7l$o31i$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5an1e$o6ib$1@dont-email.me> <v5ao4p$smd4$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v5ap10$odqa$1@dont-email.me> <v5bjn9$ursa$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v5bt3m$v0vb$2@dont-email.me> <v5cuta$10m6o$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v5d0bf$162m0$1@dont-email.me> <v5d188$10m6p$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v5d1ev$16a8b$1@dont-email.me> <v5d1mm$10m6o$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v5d3b4$16k7k$1@dont-email.me> <v5d4gj$10m6o$9@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:07:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="422dd2162c45ab1a09b084523bb5ca66";
	logging-data="1273157"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX196gZ+7mxaOYrPmw/hCzXDI"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5DADTUyF8tc3urkU72jcOtmFexk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v5d4gj$10m6o$9@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3188

On 6/24/2024 7:54 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/24/24 8:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>
>> I do correctly refute the halting problem proofs and
>> mandate mutual agreement on each step before I will
>> proceed to the next step.
> 
> Nope, you never have because you never use the definition of HALTING, 
> but insist you get to LIE about what halting is.
> 
> You are just talking about your POOP.
> 
> You are just to stupid to understand what you are talking about.
> 
>>
>> *I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
>> *I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
>> *I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
>>
>>
> 
> Where?


*We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
*We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
*We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*

D correctly simulated by H does not have the same behavior
as the directly executed D(D) because

the call from D to H(D,D) cannot possibly return when D
is correctly simulated by H.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer