| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v5d81s$17fhi$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:55:08 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 133
Message-ID: <v5d81s$17fhi$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v598l4$c4if$1@dont-email.me> <v5a4qc$h08n$1@dont-email.me>
<v5a5a1$smd5$6@i2pn2.org> <v5a657$hgsg$1@dont-email.me>
<v5a7vs$smd4$2@i2pn2.org> <v5a8hi$hsjd$1@dont-email.me>
<v5a9bi$smd4$3@i2pn2.org> <v5abdl$igvh$1@dont-email.me>
<v5ac1p$smd4$4@i2pn2.org> <v5add4$isal$1@dont-email.me>
<v5aebe$smd4$5@i2pn2.org> <v5aggb$jan3$1@dont-email.me>
<v5ah6u$smd5$7@i2pn2.org> <v5ahkc$jgfe$1@dont-email.me>
<v5ai8i$smd5$8@i2pn2.org> <v5aij8$nd1b$2@dont-email.me>
<v5ajva$smd4$6@i2pn2.org> <v5akga$nr6u$1@dont-email.me>
<v5aktu$smd4$8@i2pn2.org> <v5alis$o08r$1@dont-email.me>
<v5alpo$smd5$10@i2pn2.org> <v5am7l$o31i$1@dont-email.me>
<v5an1e$o6ib$1@dont-email.me> <v5ao4p$smd4$10@i2pn2.org>
<v5ap10$odqa$1@dont-email.me> <v5bjn9$ursa$1@i2pn2.org>
<v5bt3m$v0vb$2@dont-email.me> <v5cuta$10m6o$2@i2pn2.org>
<v5d0bf$162m0$1@dont-email.me> <v5d188$10m6p$6@i2pn2.org>
<v5d1ev$16a8b$1@dont-email.me> <v5d1mm$10m6o$8@i2pn2.org>
<v5d3b4$16k7k$1@dont-email.me> <v5d4gj$10m6o$9@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:55:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="422dd2162c45ab1a09b084523bb5ca66";
logging-data="1293874"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19X4hTlnW7RW/jBsyS0wprj"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SNwDmySikK2lI4/q1pyYICDYJtE=
In-Reply-To: <v5d4gj$10m6o$9@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 7203
On 6/24/2024 7:54 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/24/24 8:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/24/2024 7:06 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/24/24 8:02 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/24/2024 6:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/24/24 7:43 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/24/2024 6:19 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/24/24 9:42 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/24/2024 6:02 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/23/24 11:26 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/23/2024 10:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/23/24 10:52 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> for the next 10,000 messages if you really want to look
>>>>>>>>>> foolish that long.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Go ahead, stall your argument till you die.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no sense moving on to the next point until AFTER
>>>>>>>> you quit lying about this point.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _P()
>>>>>>>> [000020e2] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
>>>>>>>> [000020e3] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
>>>>>>>> [000020e5] 51 push ecx ; housekeeping
>>>>>>>> [000020e6] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08] ; parameter
>>>>>>>> [000020e9] 50 push eax ; push parameter
>>>>>>>> [000020ea] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08] ; parameter
>>>>>>>> [000020ed] 51 push ecx ; push parameter
>>>>>>>> [000020ee] e82ff3ffff call 00001422 ; call H(P,P)
>>>>>>>> [000020f3] 83c408 add esp,+08
>>>>>>>> [000020f6] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax
>>>>>>>> [000020f9] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
>>>>>>>> [000020fd] 7402 jz 00002101
>>>>>>>> [000020ff] ebfe jmp 000020ff
>>>>>>>> [00002101] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04]
>>>>>>>> [00002104] 8be5 mov esp,ebp
>>>>>>>> [00002106] 5d pop ebp
>>>>>>>> [00002107] c3 ret
>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0038) [00002107]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The call from P to H(P,P) when P is correctly emulated
>>>>>>>> by H cannot possibly return.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And my reply, like always, So?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since you are such a damned liar I am not going to give
>>>>>> you two different points to endlessly switch back and forth
>>>>>> between. I am going to keep repeating this point to prove
>>>>>> what a damned liar you really are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the LIE?
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems YOU are the LIAR.
>>>>>
>>>>>> void DDD()
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> H0(DDD);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
>>>>>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp
>>>>>> [00002183] c3 ret
>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated
>>>>>> by H0 cannot possibly return.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once we have closure on this point we can move on to
>>>>>> the last point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And what do we care about it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *It is the only thing that you will get to talk to me about*
>>>> *It is the only thing that you will get to talk to me about*
>>>> *It is the only thing that you will get to talk to me about*
>>>> *It is the only thing that you will get to talk to me about*
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good, so you are admitting you have nothing important to say.
>>
>> I do correctly refute the halting problem proofs and
>> mandate mutual agreement on each step before I will
>> proceed to the next step.
>
> Nope, you never have because you never use the definition of HALTING,
> but insist you get to LIE about what halting is.
>
> You are just talking about your POOP.
>
> You are just to stupid to understand what you are talking about.
>
>>
>> *I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
>> *I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
>> *I caught you in your lies and there you remain trapped*
>>
>>
>
> Where?
*We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
*We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
*We can get to that as soon as you reverse your lie*
You said that D correctly simulated by H must
have the behavior of the directly executed D(D).
D correctly simulated by H does not have the same behavior
as the directly executed D(D) because
the call from D to H(D,D) cannot possibly return when D
is correctly simulated by H.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer