Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bart <bc@freeuk.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Baby X is bor nagain
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:39:23 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <v5f6db$1mm97$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v494f9$von8$1@dont-email.me> <v49t6f$14i1o$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4bcbj$1gqlo$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v4bh56$1hibd$1@dont-email.me> <v4c0mg$1kjmk$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4c8s4$1lki1$4@dont-email.me> <20240613002933.000075c5@yahoo.com>
 <v4emki$28d1b$1@dont-email.me> <20240613174354.00005498@yahoo.com>
 <v4okn9$flpo$2@dont-email.me> <v4p37r$k32n$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4pei3$m5th$2@dont-email.me> <v4plsk$nn9o$2@dont-email.me>
 <v4pnq6$o4fs$1@dont-email.me> <v4q245$si2n$1@dont-email.me>
 <v4q2rl$sqk3$1@dont-email.me> <v52308$2nli8$3@dont-email.me>
 <v53i4s$33k73$2@dont-email.me> <v53lf7$34huc$1@dont-email.me>
 <v53vh6$368vf$1@dont-email.me> <v54se1$3bqsk$1@dont-email.me>
 <20240624160941.0000646a@yahoo.com> <v5bu5r$va3a$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5c275$vq9k$1@dont-email.me> <v5c6bf$10sr7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5c9jk$1159j$1@dont-email.me> <v5cnm9$14dri$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5duid$1fid4$1@dont-email.me> <v5e92f$1gs9a$1@dont-email.me>
 <667af5ce$0$2873002$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:39:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ed6e99a33e78a2b7dfe692945895dda";
	logging-data="1792295"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+eJoJKQLr64yHTymtuEZ6"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hO7qQS3jJZet/wRBRLFlHDmotUw=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <667af5ce$0$2873002$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Bytes: 2914

On 25/06/2024 17:52, DFS wrote:
> On 6/25/2024 7:18 AM, bart wrote:
>> On 25/06/2024 09:19, David Brown wrote:
>>
>>> At no point in all this does anyone care in the slightest about the 
>>> speed of your little toys or of the cute little tcc.  tcc might be 
>>> ideal for the half-dozen people in the world who think C scripts are 
>>> a good idea, and it had its place in a time when "live Linux" systems 
>>> were booted from floppies, but that's about it.
>>
>> Yet, projects like mine, and like tcc, show what is possible: just how 
>> fast should it take to turn lower level code into machine code.
> 
> 
> Can you use tcc to generate assembly from a .c source file?
> 
> similar to:
> 
> $ gcc -S sourcefile.c


I don't think that's an option with tcc.

gcc works by generating intermediate assembly anyway, and the -S option 
exposes it.

Generally it depends on compiler. Mine has it for example.