Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts?
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:41:45 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v5fa29$134dk$4@i2pn2.org>
References: <v56n8h$3pr25$1@dont-email.me> <v56ntj$onl3$7@i2pn2.org>
	<v56ps2$3q4ea$1@dont-email.me> <v56sk3$p1du$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v56tfv$3ql1v$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:41:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1151412"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1856
Lines: 19

Am Sat, 22 Jun 2024 11:18:07 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 6/22/2024 11:03 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:16:18 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 6/22/2024 9:42 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 6/22/24 10:31 AM, olcott wrote:

>>> The input to HHH0(DDD) includes itself.
>>> The input to HHH1(DDD) DOES NOT include itself.
>> Yes, both include HHH0. The second case is boring.
Suppose DDD1 only called HHH1. How would HHH1 simulate it?

> The fact that DDD calls HHH0(DDD) and does not call HHH1(DDD) changes
> the behavior of DDD correctly emulated by HHH0 relative to DDD correctly
> emulated by HHH1.
DDD does not change behaviour depending on its simulator, that is an
error on the part of the simulator. 

-- 
Man kann mit dunklen Zahlen nicht rechnen. Für die eigentliche Mathematik 
sind sie vollkommen nutzlos. --Wolfgang Mückenheim