Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v5flpc$1pj51$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Find "py.exe" & copy it to "Python" (flat, no extension). Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:01:48 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 104 Message-ID: <v5flpc$1pj51$1@dont-email.me> References: <v24179$1c3qk$2@dont-email.me> <v246gl$1d8oq$3@dont-email.me> <lamt35Fcgq7U4@mid.individual.net> <v26rjl$21vl0$1@dont-email.me> <v2ccjg$39nup$2@dont-email.me> <69sj4j50b5jb8mnbc37b1aopn58vpj0a5q@4ax.com> <v33cu1$ddl1$10@dont-email.me> <2Nj5O.33580$9xU7.24227@fx17.iad> <v36bpp$10k3v$1@dont-email.me> <PKE5O.17601$8CY1.13682@fx37.iad> <v3j4vt$3j4v3$1@dont-email.me> <665d1d57$0$2363138$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v5dlar$1dttg$2@dont-email.me> <memk7j5epu65t50ajn5vcbamj5s5uku5ig@4ax.com> <v5dpgc$1eh23$6@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 02:01:48 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="766d66d5cbc9036cf9ddd399d1e5ed72"; logging-data="1887393"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PFn/8zACJYafMQ3cozaLX" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2FiCQ4TEveQWzELrH0vzWrgeBq0= Bytes: 7065 On 2024-06-25, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:52:09 -0400, Joel wrote: > >> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> He doesn't follow God, he's a racist, a phobe, a Catholic dupe. >>> >>>The accumulation of evidence is overwhelming by now that there is no >>>contradiction between the first of those things and the rest. >> >> Or so it would be convenient for an atheist to assert ... > > Religionists do tend to prioritize their ideology over evidence, don’t > they? Evolutionists are big on "just so" stories. They believe (by faith) how the extremely highly improbable always just "mystically" happens, and that "evolution" somehow knows how to anticipate the thousands of necessary mutations that will eventually all work (beneficially) together towards some specific goal. And this is all supposed to be a result of blind "chance." You have to be amazingly gullible to believe this crap. That's why evolutionists claim there is the so-called "fact" of evolution (in other words what they believe by faith) and the "theories" of evolution (in other words the pathetic attempts at explaining this extremely improbable theory). Basically what evolutionists do is give "Evolution" God-like powers endowing it with the ability to create whatever is needed so "support" the theory. “The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory — is it then a science or a faith? Belief in the theory is thus exactly parallel to the belief in special creation, both are concepts which believers know to be true but neither, up to the present, has been capable of proof.” – L Harrison Matthews, Introduction to Charles Darwin, Origin of the Species (1971 edition) “To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner, as cited in “Was Darwin Wrong” by Francis Hitching, LIFE magazine, April 1982, p.50) “Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.” Lewontin, Richard C. [Professor of Zoology and Biology, Harvard University], “Billions and Billions of Demons”, Review of “The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark,” by Carl Sagan, New York Review, January 9, 1997. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism….How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life – the foundation of evolution – is still virtually all speculation, and little or no fact. — Dr. Christopher Williams, professor of biochemistry at Ohio State University “That a mindless, purposeless, chance process such as natural selection, acting on the sequels of recombinant DNA or random mutation, most of which are injurious or fatal, could fabricate such complexity and organisation as the vertebrate eye, where each component part must carry out its own distinctive task in a harmoniously functioning optical unit, is inconceivable. The absence of transitional forms between the invertebrate’s retina and that of the vertebrates poses another difficulty. Here there is a great gulf fixed which remains inviolate with no seeming likelihood of ever being bridged. The total picture speaks of intelligent creative design of an infinitely high order.” Dr H. S. Hamilton. MD. ‘The Retina of the Eye – An Evolutionary Road Block' Evolution is a sad joke. -- [Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality." "It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine