| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v5h844$25ui7$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Michael F. Stemper" <michael.stemper@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: The insane progress nobody is talking about Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:20:52 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 75 Message-ID: <v5h844$25ui7$1@dont-email.me> References: <slrnv760nq.ve1.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <robertaw-7D4C73.09445219062024@news.individual.net> <hWMcO.78517$qgY9.26150@fx17.iad> <gfl87jt3d5j0fj9u0t9nqt5smjnsf1a4eh@4ax.com> <v5eia1$1itk8$1@dont-email.me> <92ol7jh82mrn3b50dpq87a4f6cm9mlo4ou@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:20:53 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="914dd29a5994a4eaf9d6922c8cabd7db"; logging-data="2292295"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX182e3wDMfJ5nVeIa+K3Jz1yEBKobwwestQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:aw2qYHehL08UtZhLXjxPKCp3iqk= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <92ol7jh82mrn3b50dpq87a4f6cm9mlo4ou@4ax.com> Bytes: 4965 On 25/06/2024 10.34, Paul S Person wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:56:17 -0500, "Michael F. Stemper" > <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 20/06/2024 11.21, Paul S Person wrote: >>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 02:59:25 GMT, Random <random@who.cares> wrote: >> >>>> A conventional bulb's filament is not sensitive to AC voltage fluctionations, >>>> where the conversion electronics is. My guess is that your wiring to that >>>> light is causing voltage dips and is stressing the electronics in the LED bulb >>>> base. >>> >>> I've seen a similar claim about timers that actually count >>> cycles-per-second: if those vary then the timer misperforms. >> >> This isn't really an issue in North America. According to NERC[1], frequency in >> the Eastern Interconnection (EI) is above 59.972 Hz 95% of the time. This is >> 99.95% of nominal frequency, or an error of 28 mHz. >> >> If frequency sat that low for a 24 hour period (which it doesn't; frequency error >> regularly crosses zero), it would be a loss of 40 seconds in a day. >> >> As a matter of fact, a few years back, the EI had an ongoing problem with frequency >> being high: 3 mHz fast as a sustained average over several years. This was considered >> a significant enough issue to require an investigation[2]. >> >> If uncorrected, it would have caused clocks to gain over 4 seconds per day. This >> led to regularly implementing Time Error Correction. In this case, that meant a >> coordinated (across the EI) reduction in generation to reduce frequency until the >> time error crossed zero again. >> >> Four seconds error per day is considered a problem. If you live in North America, >> you can count[3] on your analog clock. > > Three things: > > -- I was talking about a timer, not a clock. In particular, a timer > controlling our porch light, when went wonky after about 10 years. It > could, of course, have simply aged out, or my switch to CFLs may have > been responsible, who can say? And the timer was put in in the 90s. > Still works fine as manual switch, though. Functionally, there is no difference between a timer that works by counting cycles and a clock that does the same. The laws of physics are uninterested in what you call it. If it integrates frequency, it's a clock. > -- My memory is that our City Light was reducing the CPS deliberately > -- or allowing it to fluctuate as it chose -- for some reason. Seattle City Light can not let their frequency vary independently, unless they were to disconnect from the WI, which would mean that they could no longer buy or sell energy. It would also mean that they would need to keep more generators running than would be needed for local consumption, just to meet spinning reserve requirements. > -- Seattle is not in the Eastern Interconnection. Not that I think > whatever Interconnection it /is/ in does any different than the EI. That'd be the Western Interconnection (WI), run by the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC). (It's often referred to as "WECC", since that's the only Regional Entity for the WI. Recent data[1] show that their worst performance was 2020 Q3, when they had a whopping 20+ minutes of absolute frequency error (actual versus scheduled) outside of 68 mHz. [1] <https://www.wecc.org/PerformanceAnalysis/Pages/ReliabilityIndicatorDashboard.aspx?6#Indicator6%3aTrendininterconnectionfrequencyresponseandperformance> -- Michael F. Stemper The name of the story is "A Sound of Thunder". It was written by Ray Bradbury. You're welcome.