Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Find "py.exe" & copy it to "Python" (flat, no extension).
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:41:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 74
Message-ID: <v5hcrv$26q5q$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v24179$1c3qk$2@dont-email.me> <v246gl$1d8oq$3@dont-email.me>
 <lamt35Fcgq7U4@mid.individual.net> <v26rjl$21vl0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ccjg$39nup$2@dont-email.me> <69sj4j50b5jb8mnbc37b1aopn58vpj0a5q@4ax.com>
 <v33cu1$ddl1$10@dont-email.me> <2Nj5O.33580$9xU7.24227@fx17.iad>
 <v36bpp$10k3v$1@dont-email.me> <PKE5O.17601$8CY1.13682@fx37.iad>
 <v3j4vt$3j4v3$1@dont-email.me>
 <665d1d57$0$2363138$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <v5dlar$1dttg$2@dont-email.me> <memk7j5epu65t50ajn5vcbamj5s5uku5ig@4ax.com>
 <v5dpgc$1eh23$6@dont-email.me> <v5flpc$1pj51$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5grka$23k0t$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:41:52 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="766d66d5cbc9036cf9ddd399d1e5ed72";
	logging-data="2320570"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19fq+qGQejR+ciQ7dTOXQwr"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MNJk8Qinj7fNDXqFlGd5PJF79u8=
Bytes: 5348

On 2024-06-26, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2024-06-25, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 01:52:09 -0400, Joel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> He doesn't follow God, he's a racist, a phobe, a Catholic dupe.
>>>>>
>>>>>The accumulation of evidence is overwhelming by now that there is no
>>>>>contradiction between the first of those things and the rest.
>>>> 
>>>> Or so it would be convenient for an atheist to assert ...
>>>
>>> Religionists do tend to prioritize their ideology over evidence, don’t 
>>> they?
>>
>> Evolutionists are big on "just so" stories. They believe (by faith) how the 
>> extremely highly improbable always just "mystically" happens, and that 
>> "evolution" somehow knows how to anticipate the thousands of necessary 
>> mutations that will eventually all work (beneficially) together towards some 
>> specific goal.
>>
>> And this is all supposed to be a result of blind "chance."
>
> Absolutely wrong.
>
> There is no "goal". There is no blind chance. All things derive from physics...
> chemistry... molecular biology.

Or so you claim. And yet — somehow — independently mutating cell structures 
combine with other independently mutating cell structures and then "work 
together" by spontaneously combining and forming organs like eyes (over and 
over in a multitude of different configurations), or (in the case of whales) 
they "create" cupped nipples so whale babies can nurse under water. So how 
does that work? How does evolution somehow "anticipate" that whales *will* 
need to nurse under water while they're still nursing on dry ground? 
Obviously it can't happen *after* they go into the water. (No more surviving 
whale babies.)

> There is no "faith". There's fossil evidence, field evidence, even experimental
> evidence.

Which can also be explained by creation. The problem with the fossil record 
is that there are so many gaps in it — and the way evolutionists try to 
explain those gaps away can sometimes be hilarious. Have you studied 
"punctuated equilibrium?" That was one attempt at "plugging up the logical 
holes" in the "orthodox version of the theory that gradual evolution 
believers couldn't explain away.

> Even the rolling of dice is not blind chance. It's determined by initial
> conditions and physics. A die has only 6 stable configurations. Molecules,
> including things like proteins and mucopolysaccharides, have certain
> configurations they can attain.

Okay, since you seem to have knowledge no one else has on this subject, 
explain to me, step by step, how life originated from non-life. Stringing 
together words like "dies," "molecules," "proteins" and "mucopolysacchrides" 
explains nothing. (Except for the fact that even very simple organisms are 
extremely complicated and are even less likely to arise "spontaneously.") 
The use of these words is just obfuscation that allows evolutionists to 
avoid the obvious conclusion, which is simply "I don't know." Most 
evolutionists bypass the troublesome subject of abiogenesis altogether as 
the gobbledygook explanations become embarrassing. (Remember "pre-biotic 
soup?" Another non-explanation "explanation.") Most evolutionists just jump 
right in by assuming "evolution happened" (and saying that abiogenesis is 
*not* evolution after all) and then they go directly to trying to explain 
away the gaps in the fossil record.

-- 
[Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an 
entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality." 
"It was pride that changed angels into devils..."     — St. Augustine