Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:55:52 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v5hv8o$174q9$1@i2pn2.org>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v59797$brmn$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5b7nv$qvrb$1@dont-email.me> <v5btf3$v0vb$4@dont-email.me>
	<v5chru$10816$1@i2pn2.org> <v5cn01$149dc$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5ebvr$1hs89$1@dont-email.me> <v5efod$1ikpr$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5ejau$1iq57$1@dont-email.me> <v5eup8$1lar1$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5gidq$221q3$1@dont-email.me> <v5h34g$24jbd$4@dont-email.me>
	<v5h5oq$1g3$1@news.muc.de> <v5h765$25q9l$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5he3t$1c0t$1@news.muc.de> <v5hfb8$26j79$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5hr0e$1c0t$2@news.muc.de> <v5hsjs$29tg1$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:55:52 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1282889"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 4122
Lines: 58

Am Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:10:36 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 6/26/2024 2:43 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Your posts are, in the main, tedious in the extreme.  When you repeat
>> the same thing 30 times over, you can't expect anybody to read each of
>> the repetitions as though it were fresh and new.
> I must keep repeating them until they bother to pay attention to the
> exact words that I am exactly saying because every fake rebuttal is the
> strawman deception.
That's not how it works. You should try to rephrase if you are not
understood.
A strawman is a misrepresentation. I think we understand you correctly,
if at all.

>> All the people you are debating with care about the truth.  That's why
>> they're in this group debating with you.
> It seems to me that they are only here to play the troll.
This made me laugh hysterically.

>> Anything "like" what an x86 emulator does is insufficiently precise.
> An x86 emulator is already 100% perfectly precise if the trolls that
> review my work don't think so then that proves that they are trolls.
Then why do you think that emulator can abort or otherwise change the
behaviour of its input?

>> And the "semantics of x86" don't specify anthing beyond the meaning of
>> x86 programs in general.
> *That is a stupid thing to say*
> The semantics of the x86 language provides 100% of all of the details of
> the behavior of these two functions.
There is nothing that makes this specific to x86. (Also C is not asm.)

>>> That DDD correctly emulated by H0 must continue to repeat its first
>>> four instructions is self-evident true to anyone knowing what an x86
>>> emulator is and having sufficient basic knowledge of the x86
>>> programming language.
>> It is not self-evident.
> To anyone that is mostly clueless about the x86 language.
Who are you talking to then, if you disregard our qualifications?

>>> The CS courses that fulfilled the requirements for a BSCS degree at my
>>> university had quite a bit of programming. One of the projects for the
>>> data structures course was to write a LISP interpreter that could do
>>> car, cdr and cons.
>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/eintr/car-cdr-
_0026-cons.html
>> I'm familiar with that page, being a member of the Emacs maintenance
>> team.
RIP

>>>> I haven't seen other people here lying.
>>> When they say that I am wrong knowing that they do not understand what
>>> I am saying this would be a lie.
It's your responsibility to make yourself clear.

-- 
Man kann mit dunklen Zahlen nicht rechnen. Für die eigentliche Mathematik 
sind sie vollkommen nutzlos. --Wolfgang Mückenheim