Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v5i1st$2b8qj$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 17:40:45 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 51 Message-ID: <v5i1st$2b8qj$2@dont-email.me> References: <P8OcnfwhaeSXPiT-nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <17d9412e82a8a311$8843$3053472$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com> <v4s1kl$1c3jr$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-B5B6C7.14031818062024@news.giganews.com> <v4t1nu$1ig6v$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-5889D5.18473418062024@news.giganews.com> <v4tfnl$1ons5$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-C71DF5.19385218062024@news.giganews.com> <v4v8jq$23o16$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-A285B6.12133319062024@news.giganews.com> <v4vh5f$258cf$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-35247F.16282619062024@news.giganews.com> <v52kf9$2qv7o$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-3C4CB7.18492520062024@news.giganews.com> <v52nan$2v630$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-B6CEA3.21594220062024@news.giganews.com> <v54u4f$3bnc4$3@dont-email.me> <atropos-7C8365.12342525062024@news.giganews.com> <v5ff1u$1ns3d$5@dont-email.me> <atropos-A3B338.15513525062024@news.giganews.com> <v5fv2g$1uphg$2@dont-email.me> <atropos-082957.20100425062024@news.giganews.com> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:40:46 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d2d90a48413b38a40b2d22a00d23c588"; logging-data="2466643"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/COCqzIuUjEYdMd4rhVKGD5dXCld0lX90=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:VYIhjESwLYS71+QtUENB+bpZCbA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <atropos-082957.20100425062024@news.giganews.com> Bytes: 3957 On 6/25/2024 11:10 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article <v5fv2g$1uphg$2@dont-email.me>, > moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > >> On 6/25/2024 6:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article <v5ff1u$1ns3d$5@dont-email.me>, >>> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/25/2024 3:34 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article <v54u4f$3bnc4$3@dont-email.me>, >>>>> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/21/2024 12:59 AM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> In article <v52nan$2v630$5@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How are they substantively different, counselor? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One's trigger is functioned only once, the other's trigger functions >>>>>>>>> for every round fired. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. Same single function. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Literally not. The firing mechanism inside the gun requires the trigger >>>>>>> go through its full cycle of function (depressed, released, and reset) >>>>>>> for every round fired in a semi-auto rifle. It's only activated once >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> an entire burst in a machine gun. >>>>>> >>>>>> In both machine gun and bump-stock, the trigger cycle "consults" the >>>>>> shooter's finger during each cycle. If there's pressure it fires, if >>>>>> not it stops. For the shooter the guns are *functionally* identical. >>>>> >>>>> Which might be relevant if the NFA regulated firearms in any way, shape, >>>>> or form based on what it's like for the shooter. It does not therefore >>>>> it is not. >>>> >>>> You think "single function of the trigger" doesn't entail the shooter's >>>> experience of it? >> > >>> No, it doesn't. >> >> You mean, "Yes I do." > > You keep telling me what I mean, but I assure you, Kreskin, that if I > mean something I write it. If it's not in what I've written, it's not > what I mean. What *is* the proper response to an opinion given as unassailable fact?