Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 -- Ben agrees that Sipser approved
 criteria is met
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:20:07 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <v5ib7n$2cko8$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v45tec$4q15$1@dont-email.me> <v4sd35$1eb2f$5@dont-email.me>
 <v4u3jl$1se49$1@dont-email.me> <v4umvh$1vpm0$7@dont-email.me>
 <v50d8k$2e51s$1@dont-email.me> <v50dtp$2e5ij$1@dont-email.me>
 <v51f4t$2k8ar$1@dont-email.me> <v51ge4$2kbbe$2@dont-email.me>
 <v539bk$329sv$1@dont-email.me> <v53upb$35vak$6@dont-email.me>
 <v575pl$3sg5p$1@dont-email.me> <v5767s$3soh6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5e28t$11urb$5@i2pn2.org> <v5eg03$1ikpr$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5eho7$24l4$1@news.muc.de> <87jzidm83f.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v5el8c$24l4$4@news.muc.de> <v5evoi$1lgoi$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5frvn$14bcm$6@i2pn2.org> <v5ft1p$1uc3o$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5fu24$14bcn$2@i2pn2.org> <v5fuf7$1up2o$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5fvvk$14bcn$4@i2pn2.org> <v5g1ue$1v8bm$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5g29u$14bcm$11@i2pn2.org> <v5g2nd$1v8bm$4@dont-email.me>
 <v5gsfv$15l89$2@i2pn2.org> <v5h5sd$24jbd$10@dont-email.me>
 <v5i8v9$17ej1$2@i2pn2.org> <v5i998$2cko8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5i9ot$17ej0$3@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 02:20:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d7b6b7ddfe8775f34f568700240d9d1b";
	logging-data="2511624"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/imbEQOVyklGtO8PyxiKRD"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:k+CWx4sO/pbUdEqiEbK6LyRkuWA=
In-Reply-To: <v5i9ot$17ej0$3@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3581

On 6/26/2024 6:55 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/26/24 7:46 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/26/2024 6:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/26/24 9:42 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/26/2024 6:02 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/25/24 11:42 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is not the way that it actually works.
>>>>>> That the the way that lies are defined.
>>>>>
>>>>> Source for you claim?
>>>>>
>>>>> Where is you finite set of steps from the truthmakers of the system 
>>>>> to that claim?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _DDD()
>>>> [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
>>>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>>>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>>>> [00002183] c3               ret
>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>
>>>> The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated
>>>> by H0 cannot possibly return.
>>>
>>> Sure it can. I have shown an H0 that does so.
>>>
>>
>> I already told you that example does not count.
>>
>> I can't keep repeating those details or others
>> that so far have no idea what an x86 emulator is
>> will be baffled beyond all hope of comprehension.
>>
> 
> WHy not?
> 

We have already been over that you know that you cheated.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer