Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v5ikl0$1i4v$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,uk.telecom.mobile Subject: Re: Carriers are only slowly adapting to iOS 18 beta RCS integration Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 03:00:48 -0000 (UTC) Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com) Message-ID: <v5ikl0$1i4v$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> References: <v5drrv$3rm56$1@news.usenet.ovh> <v5duoe$24dul$1@solani.org> <v5ef1o$1ih07$1@dont-email.me> <v5ektu$1jdau$1@dont-email.me> <865xtxm2zm.fsf@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 03:00:48 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com; logging-data="51359"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com" Cancel-Lock: sha1:ki6uTW8bfuppNVUQ+/wkPDJLDhs= sha256:l9x5mpE/lFGK1vfL1QxmmwIZJoMLquf+PO0NdIJZMR8= sha1:a8LwRmKn/l50iaGJByYTn3F9zSI= sha256:vGaTttCRDB3sVHqHvxl5jlNeSkXcaFGm9QUFQxM8440= X-Newsreader: PiaoHong.Usenet.Client.Free:1.65 Bytes: 2023 Lines: 14 Richmond wrote on Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:55:09 +0100 : > RCS can support end to end encryption. Just to be clear about the privacy invasive design of the Apple encryption implementation, you *must* log into Apple's Internet servers for it to work; hence, Apple knows all the metadata surrounding all your messages. To be just as clear, the current Android encryption implementations suffer from the same huge privacy hole as does the iOS messaging, whether that's WhatsApp or PulseSMS or Signal, etc., in that the moment you are logged into a server on the Internet, your privacy is instant toast, by design. However... I have no idea how RCS handles its encryption implementation. Does RCS messaging also require the privacy-invasive server log in action?