Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:16:48 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v5ilj0$17ej1$15@i2pn2.org>
References: <v598l4$c4if$1@dont-email.me> <v5d1mm$10m6o$8@i2pn2.org>
 <v5d3b4$16k7k$1@dont-email.me> <v5d4gj$10m6o$9@i2pn2.org>
 <v5d81s$17fhi$1@dont-email.me> <v5d8fr$10m6o$12@i2pn2.org>
 <v5d9iv$1bem6$2@dont-email.me> <v5d9s6$10m6p$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v5daji$1bll8$1@dont-email.me> <v5db62$10m6o$13@i2pn2.org>
 <v5dckm$1bteo$1@dont-email.me> <v5e87h$12a1a$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v5ef4n$1ihbr$1@dont-email.me> <v5frvi$14bcm$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v5fslr$1uc3o$1@dont-email.me> <v5fto2$14bcm$9@i2pn2.org>
 <v5fu06$1umhr$1@dont-email.me> <v5fvtf$14bcn$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v5g1nr$1v8bm$1@dont-email.me> <v5g24k$14bcm$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v5g2ds$1v8bm$3@dont-email.me> <v5gs85$15l89$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v5h5c4$24jbd$9@dont-email.me> <v5i8vg$17ej1$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v5i9fh$2cko8$2@dont-email.me> <v5i9j2$17ej0$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v5ibfc$2cko8$5@dont-email.me> <v5icdm$17ej1$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v5ie9f$2dcfs$1@dont-email.me> <v5ieqg$17ej0$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v5ihn6$2hkk4$3@dont-email.me> <v5ijbq$17ej1$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v5ijq1$2i32s$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 03:16:48 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1292897"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <v5ijq1$2i32s$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 5809
Lines: 108

On 6/26/24 10:46 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 6/26/2024 9:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 6/26/24 10:10 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 6/26/2024 8:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 6/26/24 9:12 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 6/26/2024 7:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/26/24 8:24 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/26/2024 6:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike understands how your use of static variables is cheating.
>>>>>>> Others here will be baffled and confused.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But the rules are the rules, and you can't create rules you didn't 
>>>>>> state.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you really have such brain damage that you cannot remember
>>>>> that we already discussed this and closed it I will start
>>>>> praying for you.
>>>>
>>>> And if I am allowed, or even required to remember that, then I can 
>>>> remember that your Hs are all designed to be Halt Deciders, and thus 
>>>> the only correct behavior for their input is that of the direct 
>>>> execution of the program the input represents.
>>>>
>>>
>>> NONE-THE-LESS I WILL NOT TOLERATE YOU LEAPING TO THE CONCLUSION
>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT WITHOUT GOING THROUGH EVER SINGLE STEP.
>>> *When you do this I will point out your specific deceit*
>>
>> But if you don't include the restriction, it isn't there, and the fact 
>> we are so many steps ahead of you isn't grounds to say we don't know 
>> what we know.
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> YOU CAN'T FREAKING USE ANY STATIC LOCAL VARIABLES TO
>>>>> CHANGE THE BEHAVIOR AND YOU KNOW WHY YOU CAN'T USE
>>>>> THEM SO FREAKING QUIT IT !!!
>>>>>
>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>> [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD)
>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>>>>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>>>>> [00002183] c3               ret
>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>>
>>>>> The call from DDD to H0(DDD) when DDD is correctly emulated
>>>>> by x86 emulator H0 cannot possibly return.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But it does, it just isn't emulated by H0.
>>>>
>>>
>>> THAT IS THE FREAKING DAMNED LIAR STRAW-MAN DECEPTION.
>>
>> The "Behavior" of the input is DEFINED by the semantics of the x86 
>> instruction set.
>>
>> NO instruction, other than Halt, stops the processor from continuing, 
>> thus the behavior of the input doesn't stop just because the emulator 
>> stoped processing it.
>>
>>>
>>> When I say that there are some people that are so poor
>>> that they are starving to death and we must halt them
>>>
>>> you cannot (morally) say there is no need to help them
>>> because rich people are not starving to death.
>>
>> RED HERRING.
>>
>>>
>>> Christ taught in parables I teach in isomorphisms.
>>>
>>
>> But broken ones, that are just RED HERRING LIES.
>>
>> And, I know Christ, and you are NOT Christ, and it is almost 
>> blasphemous for you to make that comparasion, especially since you 
>> have claimed to be God in the past.
>>
>> THAT WILL send you to Gehenna.
> 
> I am not the liar here. I think that we have gone
> way beyond reasonable doubt that you have told lies.

Really, so what statement have I said that isn't actually true.

Not just that you disagree with it, since you have been proven to be a 
liar, but that you can actualy preove to be untrtue.

Your ignorance does not make my statements lies.

> 
> Maybe you are one of those "Christians" that believes
> once saved always saved even if you commit genocide
> for fun an profit.
> 

Nope. You don't know me well, so you are just making your typical wild 
guesses with no basis.
That is what gets you in trouble every time.