Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Find "py.exe" & copy it to "Python" (flat, no extension).
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 07:38:39 -0400
Organization: None
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <v5jj00$2ndb5$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v24179$1c3qk$2@dont-email.me> <v246gl$1d8oq$3@dont-email.me>
 <lamt35Fcgq7U4@mid.individual.net> <v26rjl$21vl0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ccjg$39nup$2@dont-email.me> <69sj4j50b5jb8mnbc37b1aopn58vpj0a5q@4ax.com>
 <v33cu1$ddl1$10@dont-email.me> <2Nj5O.33580$9xU7.24227@fx17.iad>
 <v36bpp$10k3v$1@dont-email.me> <PKE5O.17601$8CY1.13682@fx37.iad>
 <v3j4vt$3j4v3$1@dont-email.me>
 <665d1d57$0$2363138$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <v5dlar$1dttg$2@dont-email.me> <memk7j5epu65t50ajn5vcbamj5s5uku5ig@4ax.com>
 <v5dpgc$1eh23$6@dont-email.me> <c8xeO.13067$zMs3.416@fx48.iad>
 <v5eb77$1hofv$1@dont-email.me> <v5fn3u$1pj51$3@dont-email.me>
 <le1koaF77bmU1@mid.individual.net> <v5haef$266pr$3@dont-email.me>
 <le2tp8Fd30jU1@mid.individual.net> <v5iasu$2cssn$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: OFeem1987@teleworm.us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:38:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a02c9858b3283f41e8130a57b38f55fd";
	logging-data="2864485"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2EMDBTrLUx3rYmD+qvGVO"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eLDcQDH497B854Nu16F34iBgeWI=
X-Mutt: The most widely-used MUA
X-Slrn: Why use anything else?
X-User-Agent: Microsoft Outl00k, Usenet K00k Editions
Bytes: 3219

RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2024-06-26, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:00:32 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>>
>>> On 2024-06-26, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 00:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> . All of which ultimately give "Evolution"
>>>>> creative powers that can anticipate future needs and somehow
>>>>> (supposedly by chance) "create" complex organs, like eyes — and not
>>>>> once, but every different type of eye. Chance is a pathetic
>>>>> explanation for the complexity of life. It's just too stupid for me to
>>>>> accept. I'm not that gullible.
>>>>
>>>> Teleology and biology have a long and complicated relationship.
>>> 
>>> A relationship that evolution fails to explain.
>>
>> Biology should not be concerned with teleology. There is no Teilhard de 
>> Chardin great plan. 'Post hoc ergo propter hoc' and its friends are the 
>> favorite human fallacy. Here we are and there must have been a reason 
>> rather than a few billion years of a genetic drunkard's walk algorithm.
>
> Not arguing that science should deal with teleology. I'm must saying 
> evolution doesn't explain it. It relies on "just so" stories.

No it does not. You need to quit watching the Discovery and History channels.

-- 
You will pass away very quickly.