Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v5ludv$3980v$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts? Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:06:07 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 123 Message-ID: <v5ludv$3980v$1@dont-email.me> References: <v56n8h$3pr25$1@dont-email.me> <v58ql8$9g3i$1@dont-email.me> <v597ju$brmn$2@dont-email.me> <v5b7f8$qu74$1@dont-email.me> <v5btit$v0vb$5@dont-email.me> <v5bub0$vagk$1@dont-email.me> <v5e3ou$1ge18$2@dont-email.me> <v5eg5j$1ikpr$3@dont-email.me> <v5ghfv$21s9r$1@dont-email.me> <v5h2vs$24jbd$3@dont-email.me> <v5j3nn$2km3o$1@dont-email.me> <v5kfat$2rv8r$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:06:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a7b5d45ea651ac5e859b2687eb76fd47"; logging-data="3448863"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18MnXTUXSPJmUxgdTxKgAEL" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vd7x0ovvwaZfKXWQ2EGvcuHKud0= Bytes: 6584 On 2024-06-27 19:42:21 +0000, olcott said: > On 6/27/2024 2:18 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-06-26 12:53:16 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 6/26/2024 2:54 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> >>>> Obviously false. The meaning of H(P,P) is determined by the text of H. >>>> The meaning is fully determined by the complier that complies to the >>>> x86 code and the semantics of x86. If one simulator interpretes the >>>> x86 code differently from another simulator then one of them does not >>>> follow the x86 semantics and is therefore incorrect. >>> >>> _DDD() >>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call H0(DDD) >>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >>> [00002183] c3 ret >>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >>> >>> The call from DDD to >>> the x86 emulator H0(DDD) at machine address 0000217a >>> when DDD is correctly emulated by H0 cannot possibly return. >>> >>> When DDD is correctly emulated by H0 then H0 must emulate itself >>> emulating DDD. This derives recursive emulation. >>> >>> When DDD is correctly emulated by H1 then H1 NEED NOT emulate itself >>> emulating DDD. This DOES NOT derive recursive emulation. >> >> When DDD is emulated by H1 then H1 needs to the call to H0 and the >> instructions of H0 which emulate DDD and its call to H0 and a recorsive >> emulation follows. If H1 emulates correctly it must not emulate the >> emulation of the instruction at 217f. Unless, of course, you lied >> about H0. > > You contradict yourself. You have not shown any self-contradiction in my words. There is no obvious self-contradiction but maybe there is some less obvious mistake. > *Here is what actually happens* > > _DDD() > [00002172] 55 push ebp > [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp > [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD > [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH0 > [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 > [00002182] 5d pop ebp > [00002183] c3 ret > Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] > > _main() > [00002192] 55 push ebp > [00002193] 8bec mov ebp,esp > [00002195] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD > [0000219a] e863f3ffff call 00001502 ; call HHH1(DDD) > [0000219f] 83c404 add esp,+04 > [000021a2] 50 push eax > [000021a3] 6843070000 push 00000743 > [000021a8] e8b5e5ffff call 00000762 > [000021ad] 83c408 add esp,+08 > [000021b0] eb04 jmp 000021b6 > [000021b2] 33c0 xor eax,eax > [000021b4] eb02 jmp 000021b8 > [000021b6] 33c0 xor eax,eax > [000021b8] 5d pop ebp > [000021b9] c3 ret > Size in bytes:(0040) [000021b9] > > machine stack stack machine assembly > address address data code language > ======== ======== ======== ========= ============= > [00002192][00103826][00000000] 55 push ebp > [00002193][00103826][00000000] 8bec mov ebp,esp > [00002195][00103822][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD > [0000219a][0010381e][0000219f] e863f3ffff call 00001502 ; call HHH1(DDD) > New slave_stack at:1038ca > > Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:1138d2 > [00002172][001138c2][001138c6] 55 push ebp > [00002173][001138c2][001138c6] 8bec mov ebp,esp > [00002175][001138be][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD > [0000217a][001138ba][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH0(DDD) > New slave_stack at:14e2f2 > > Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:15e2fa > [00002172][0015e2ea][0015e2ee] 55 push ebp > [00002173][0015e2ea][0015e2ee] 8bec mov ebp,esp > [00002175][0015e2e6][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD > [0000217a][0015e2e2][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH0(DDD) > New slave_stack at:198d1a > [00002172][001a8d12][001a8d16] 55 push ebp > [00002173][001a8d12][001a8d16] 8bec mov ebp,esp > [00002175][001a8d0e][00002172] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD > [0000217a][001a8d0a][0000217f] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH0(DDD) > Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped > > [0000217f][001138c2][001138c6] 83c404 add esp,+04 ; return to DDD > [00002182][001138c6][000015b7] 5d pop ebp > [00002183][001138ca][0003a980] c3 ret ; return to main > [0000219f][00103826][00000000] 83c404 add esp,+04 > [000021a2][00103822][00000001] 50 push eax > [000021a3][0010381e][00000743] 6843070000 push 00000743 > [000021a8][0010381e][00000743] e8b5e5ffff call 00000762 > Input_Halts = 1 > [000021ad][00103826][00000000] 83c408 add esp,+08 > [000021b0][00103826][00000000] eb04 jmp 000021b6 > [000021b6][00103826][00000000] 33c0 xor eax,eax > [000021b8][0010382a][00000018] 5d pop ebp > [000021b9][0010382e][00000000] c3 ret > Number of Instructions Executed(352835) == 5266 Pages Is the program at 15d2 H0 or HHH0? -- Mikko