Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:12:57 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 96
Message-ID: <v5mjtp$3cvu7$2@dont-email.me>
References: <P8OcnfwhaeSXPiT-nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v4i2m6$30bm2$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-25D624.12335314062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v4ih8u$336lr$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-C652A7.15471614062024@news.giganews.com>
 <17d91fbd5fad865f$338100$533214$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v4kgh9$3i0t8$1@dont-email.me>
 <17d9412e82a8a311$8843$3053472$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>
 <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v4llgt$3s90d$1@dont-email.me>
 <17d97111755ab6ae$133791$675878$4ed50460@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v4s1q2$1c3jr$7@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-4879CF.14000618062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v4t1dt$1ig6v$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-10EF54.18431818062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v52jlr$2qnl3$7@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-0BD5BE.18320220062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v52n0u$2v630$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-76DC0A.22083520062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v56pju$3qb1e$3@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-2EB311.12290125062024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:12:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ab3d7bebfc6f34884c789dcb5af967e3";
	logging-data="3571655"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18MJGHrFTZkdJmN7blSHHhU"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9jdrfTKCpxbbizNT5+UVkocnh8M=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <atropos-2EB311.12290125062024@news.giganews.com>
Bytes: 6016

On 6/25/24 3:29 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v56pju$3qb1e$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/21/24 1:08 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> In article <v52n0u$2v630$2@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/20/24 9:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> In article <v52jlr$2qnl3$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/18/24 9:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <v4t1dt$1ig6v$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>      moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/18/2024 5:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <v4s1q2$1c3jr$7@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe if we all chipped in a few bucks, Clarenzabell and Sammy
>>>>>>>>>> Flagflyer would change their votes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Weird how Alito's flag also has flown over San Francisco's city hall
>>>>>>>>> for more than half a century. Hardly a bastion of conservatism, San
>>>>>>>>> Francisco. Yet when SF prog pols fly it, it's no big deal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://ibb.co/S6wFxDy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It was also used prominently by BLM during their 'mostly peaceful'
>>>>>>>>> Summer of Love.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://ibb.co/Z8kvvMc
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So to recap: a flag when flown by leftist pols and far-left violent
>>>>>>>>> communist protest groups is totes cool, but the moment a conservative
>>>>>>>>> raises it on his private property, he should be impeached and removed
>>>>>>>>> from office.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes, we hold a Supreme Court Justice to a stricter standard of
>>>>>>>> impartiality than we do an organization like BLM.  Life's unfair...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Government officials are government officials. If it's not a problem
>>>>>>> for the ones in San Francisco to fly it, it's not a problem for any
>>>>>>> official to fly it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do they still fly it? And if not, why not?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea. I haven't been to San Francisco in several years. But
>>>>> they flew it for 60 years. If it was the appalling affront to democracy,
>>>>> apple pie, and tiny, tiny babies that you act like it is, why were the
>>>>> good little progs of San Francisco flying it over the sacred halls of
>>>>> government there for more than a half a century?
>>>>>
>>>> Then shut the fuck up about it if you admit you don't know what you're
>>>> talking about today.
>>>
>>> It's apparent you have no answer to the question asked and no, I won't
>>> "shut the fuck up" about anything. I'll speak about whatever I want,
>>> whenever I want and I certainly don't need your permission to do so.
>>>
>>> 60 years, Effa. 60 years.
>>>
>>> And don't forget those BLMers. I guess we finally have proof they were
>>> insurrectionists all along, since only insurrectionists fly that flag.
>>>
>> I gave you an answer. Either you didn't like it, or you couldn't grasp it.
> 
> No, I asked you:
> 
> "If it was the appalling affront to democracy, apple pie, and tiny, tiny
> babies that you act like it is, why were the good little progs of San
> Francisco flying it over the sacred halls of government there for more
> than a half a century?"
> 
> And you just told me to "shut the fuck up about it". That's not an
> answer to the question posed to you.
> 
> That's a dodge and an evasion.
> 
>> MAGA co-opted the flag
> 
> One guy waving it at one protest does not a "co-opt" make, you dipshit.
> 

One guy... what a joke you are.  Can't read, and now can't count.

-- 
On May 30, 2024 Donald J. Trump was unanimously convicted on 34 felony 
counts in New York City... so I took this picture in my side yard.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0

"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0