Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v5mola$3dpk3$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: 5th Circuit Strikes Down Bump Stock Ban
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:33:45 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <v5mola$3dpk3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <atropos-13D763.17305115062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v51ik8$2kkd7$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-696A04.09292320062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v5203r$2n6c1$3@dont-email.me>
 <1oucnSmdyL0VBun7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v52knn$2qv7o$5@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-7D5EFE.19185120062024@news.giganews.com>
 <v56pft$3qb1e$2@dont-email.me>
 <lTSdnT7Heb6bc-v7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v56rdi$3qngn$2@dont-email.me>
 <qpWdnXeHkrbQbuv7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v5mjv0$3cvu7$3@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-52908B.09075228062024@news.giganews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 18:33:47 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="abddbbe2509c3aa1c6b780ec1f73f6e4";
	logging-data="3597955"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+SvB/sP+QkoU/X3Z4mQqf4ZmSIwtCK9b8="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:n4V1gIY8+ICbId1wx3uCHn1iNl4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <atropos-52908B.09075228062024@news.giganews.com>
Bytes: 3349

On 6/28/2024 12:07 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <v5mjv0$3cvu7$3@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 6/22/24 11:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 6/22/24 11:30 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> They decide law based on intent all the time. It's a staple of the
>>>>>> system.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cool! Let's go with intent, then. Which means all those millions of
>>>>> illegals pretending to be refugees and just reciting the magic words to
>>>>> game the system can be summarily denied and deported because the intent
>>>>> of the refugee law was never to allow millions of people who don't
>>>>> qualify as refugees to game and overwhelm the system and flood
>>>>> unchecked into the country.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regardless of what the law actually says, its intent was never to
>>>>> create the current border crisis we're currently experiencing, so we
>>>>> can ignore what's written and just go with intent.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm really starting to warm up to The Law According to Effa!
>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think the Supreme Court uses to judge whether a law is
>>>>>> constitutional?
>>>>>
>>>>> Umm... the Constitution.
>>>>
>>>> Ummm... pass the border bill your side wrote.
>>>
>>> No need. We already have the intent of the Immigration and Naturalization
>>> Act!
>>>
>> Then why hasn't anyone said that, besides you?
> 
> Because deciding cases based on intent isn't really a thing. Something I
> was trying to illustrate with sarcasm.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_and_spirit_of_the_law

Gosh, it *seems* to really be a thing...


> You're now actually making my case for me. Well done!