Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan Browne <singularity@blackhole.org>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,uk.telecom.mobile
Subject: Re: Carriers are only slowly adapting to iOS 18 beta RCS integration
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:35:20 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <v5ms8o$3ehqa$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v5drrv$3rm56$1@news.usenet.ovh> <v5eefq$1id91$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5elrk$ufp$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> <v5f9n0$1nct2$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5fgec$1ojrl$1@dont-email.me> <v5kdk7$2seoc$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5lsj5$28oil$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:35:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cc5dab326a7b506e2ba726b4b8fe7072";
	logging-data="3622730"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18KyoWu+ZyiFJ/QO4HY3YS1KvDThxWU8JY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WEoP3CXNtCPT36rNNehZjfJN+HY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v5lsj5$28oil$1@solani.org>
Bytes: 2918

On 2024-06-28 04:34, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
> Am 27.06.24 um 21:13 schrieb Alan Browne:
>> On 2024-06-25 18:30, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
>>> Am 25.06.24 um 22:35 schrieb Alan Browne:
>>>> On 2024-06-25 10:56, Gelato wrote:
>>>>> Once Apple supports RCS & after the carriers support their iOS RCS
>>>>> bundles,
>>>>> what problems will be solved when RCS is finally working on both
>>>>> platforms?
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully the problem of transparently sending large files from(to) iOS
>>>> to(from) Android with little effort or loss.  Hopefully avoiding the
>>>> "phone" paradigm along the way.  And of course the whole encryption
>>>> issue also needs to be worked out so that it is not Google oriented.
>>>
>>> Only the real amateurs and houswifes do it that way.
>>> *ROTFSTC*
>>
>> You're an ass as usual.  I move files according to what is needed for
>> security (95% of the time: none) and then convenience.
> 
> A server- or a cloud-link is much faster, more convenient, more secure,
> more versatile and in the case of confident material much much more
> private. Google with its platform is never trustworthy. Under no
> circumstances.

You're the one bringing Google into it w/o realizing Apple want nothing 
to do with Google's encryption.  This has been pointed out to you 
several times but you duck it because it does not fit your distorted 
(and very wrong) world view.

> *You are an amateur*

I am so far beyond you, you can't see me.

-- 
"It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
  the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
Winston Churchill