| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v5ndf6$3hout$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Does the number of nines increase? Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:28:53 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <v5ndf6$3hout$1@dont-email.me> References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <v5fj5p$1p64h$1@dont-email.me> <fA5vw6G2OY5zsaJDYolWTVeG_f4@jntp> <v5gr7n$23kvp$1@dont-email.me> <7wkbtvSTj5qxo8_49h08Og16QF8@jntp> <v5khb0$2spnv$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 00:28:55 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1dec0191834013eb7d293450cfe2cb7e"; logging-data="3728349"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/gN+HkVqEL1/GP9uEnVXDvsWV3wq76SsM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:E8JnmSgP0yXatxfy2XTy/AJAXy4= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v5khb0$2spnv$3@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2051 On 6/27/2024 1:16 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 6/27/2024 4:49 AM, WM wrote: >> Le 26/06/2024 à 12:40, FromTheRafters a écrit : >>> WM has brought this to us : >> >>>>>> Corollary-question: Does the number of nines grow when in 0.999 >>>>>> the decimal point is shifted by one or more position? >>>>> >>>>> What do you think multiplying by ten does to a continued decimal >>>>> expansion representation? >>>> >>>> You must understand that no natural number can be added to the >>>> complete set. >>> >>> Of course not, a set contains *all* of its elements. >> >> And all are indices of the nines in 0.999... . > > > r[0] = .9 > r[n] = r[0] + 10^(-n) * .9 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ahhh shit! Damn typos! That recursion should be: r[n] = r[n - 1] + 10^(-n) * .9 Sorry everybody! > > lets expand it for a couple of iterations: [...] >