Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v5ndf6$3hout$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Does the number of nines increase?
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 15:28:53 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <v5ndf6$3hout$1@dont-email.me>
References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <v5fj5p$1p64h$1@dont-email.me>
 <fA5vw6G2OY5zsaJDYolWTVeG_f4@jntp> <v5gr7n$23kvp$1@dont-email.me>
 <7wkbtvSTj5qxo8_49h08Og16QF8@jntp> <v5khb0$2spnv$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 00:28:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1dec0191834013eb7d293450cfe2cb7e";
	logging-data="3728349"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/gN+HkVqEL1/GP9uEnVXDvsWV3wq76SsM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:E8JnmSgP0yXatxfy2XTy/AJAXy4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v5khb0$2spnv$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2051

On 6/27/2024 1:16 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 6/27/2024 4:49 AM, WM wrote:
>> Le 26/06/2024 à 12:40, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>>> WM has brought this to us :
>>
>>>>>> Corollary-question: Does the number of nines grow when in 0.999 
>>>>>> the decimal point is shifted by one or more position?
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think multiplying by ten does to a continued decimal 
>>>>> expansion representation?
>>>>
>>>> You must understand that no natural number can be added to the 
>>>> complete set. 
>>>
>>> Of course not, a set contains *all* of its elements.
>>
>> And all are indices of the nines in 0.999... .
> 
> 
> r[0] = .9
> r[n] = r[0] + 10^(-n) * .9
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Ahhh shit! Damn typos! That recursion should be:

r[n] = r[n - 1] + 10^(-n) * .9

Sorry everybody!


> 
> lets expand it for a couple of iterations:
[...]
>