| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v5phiq$168u$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Baby X is bor nagain Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 18:51:22 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: <v5phiq$168u$2@dont-email.me> References: <v494f9$von8$1@dont-email.me> <v53i4s$33k73$2@dont-email.me> <v53lf7$34huc$1@dont-email.me> <v53vh6$368vf$1@dont-email.me> <v54se1$3bqsk$1@dont-email.me> <20240624160941.0000646a@yahoo.com> <v5bu5r$va3a$1@dont-email.me> <20240624181006.00003b94@yahoo.com> <v5c86d$11ac7$1@dont-email.me> <JEheO.108086$ED9b.74955@fx11.iad> <v5cblg$11q0j$1@dont-email.me> <gEieO.108089$ED9b.25598@fx11.iad> <20240625113616.000075e0@yahoo.com> <mUzeO.141609$Cqra.55051@fx10.iad> <v5elql$1jmii$1@dont-email.me> <m3BeO.24907$Gurd.16179@fx34.iad> <v5empd$1jndv$2@dont-email.me> <v5eph4$1k6a9$1@dont-email.me> <87ed8jnbmf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v5jhls$2m7np$1@dont-email.me> <v5jm32$2nqvp$1@dont-email.me> <v5k3v2$2qllm$1@dont-email.me> <v5kfst$2svt3$1@dont-email.me> <v5kmlm$2u918$1@dont-email.me> <v5lfq9$35vli$1@dont-email.me> <20240628112047.000003e9@yahoo.com> <v5oip3$3rp4r$1@dont-email.me> <20240629021345.405@kylheku.com> Reply-To: nospam.harnden@invalid.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 19:51:23 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="59c5ac1a170b791d952ea5e96b57aa8c"; logging-data="39198"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5gHRSZGANIZQWad2jS0jkgJShTC8uSn8=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:nn9rqxfTRVQC9FbWpBINu9hZAes= In-Reply-To: <20240629021345.405@kylheku.com> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2623 On 29/06/2024 10:15, Kaz Kylheku wrote: > On 2024-06-29, David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote: >> gcc toolchains are free, and the standard from manufacturers for a very >> long time. The others are very expensive, and it's very questionable if >> they actually provide much extra value for most development teams. >> (They /do/ provide better tools for some kinds of development.) >> Consequently, gcc is overwhelmingly the most popular. > > One thing: builds having to talk to some god forsaken licensing server > to get permission to compile is beyond ridiculous. > I haven't seen that since, like, the 90s. Does that actually still happen?