Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v5st66$o7ss$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v5st66$o7ss$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the
 semantics of the x86 language
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:27:50 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <v5st66$o7ss$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5sbpt$1kfbr$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v5sjsa$msl0$1@dont-email.me> <v5skc9$1kfbr$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v5smuk$n7a2$1@dont-email.me> <v5sorr$1kfbr$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v5sp4v$nnko$1@dont-email.me> <v5sr4t$1kfbq$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v5srjn$o1o0$1@dont-email.me> <v5ssaq$1kfbq$2@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 02:27:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f83257e6e5a87f489aa8241c55498376";
	logging-data="794524"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vEHC04mm0hJ5oJ8Uq8zsk"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UtaqKEcV6GYPNs+Y323Wth9pSJ0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v5ssaq$1kfbq$2@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 2370

On 6/30/2024 7:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/30/24 8:00 PM, olcott wrote:
>>
>> THIS SEQUENCE CANNOT POSSIBLY RETURN WHY PERSISTENTLY LIE ABOUT IT?
>> THIS SEQUENCE CANNOT POSSIBLY RETURN WHY PERSISTENTLY LIE ABOUT IT?
>> THIS SEQUENCE CANNOT POSSIBLY RETURN WHY PERSISTENTLY LIE ABOUT IT?
>> THIS SEQUENCE CANNOT POSSIBLY RETURN WHY PERSISTENTLY LIE ABOUT IT?
>> THIS SEQUENCE CANNOT POSSIBLY RETURN WHY PERSISTENTLY LIE ABOUT IT?
>>
> 
> But it does, just after H gives up its simulation.
> 
> You have even show that with a simulation.
> 

Liar Liar Pants on Fire !!!
Liar Liar Pants on Fire !!!
Liar Liar Pants on Fire !!!

  DDD correctly emulated by HHH calls an emulated HHH(DDD)
that emulates its own DDD that calls an emulated HHH(DDD)
that is either aborted at some point never returning or
hits out-of-memory error never returning



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer