Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: 0 SET-ORDER why?
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:49:06 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <v5t1ui$sl14$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v5fjkr$1p13i$1@dont-email.me>
 <2024Jun26.094910@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <v5gs5j$23lka$2@dont-email.me>
 <2024Jun28.175045@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <v5p51t$3utd9$2@dont-email.me>
 <6680c10c$1@news.ausics.net> <v5s019$jbd6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5s0d3$jbd6$2@dont-email.me>
 <bf66af7e3abb6d49d1e6ff2935802477@www.novabbs.com>
 <v5s8a8$ksnb$1@dont-email.me>
 <5c6520a0dd123d02281bb631ae5389dc@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 03:49:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2f5cc790751f949ac7d1d5bc57fd0a9e";
	logging-data="939044"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+SdbdqmWWa4OFS+tzpbEdv"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3acohbFfZiJgdruGmGmqjYh8nVk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <5c6520a0dd123d02281bb631ae5389dc@www.novabbs.com>

On 6/30/24 15:37, minforth wrote:
> My "implementation-defined option" 0 SET-ORDER locks everyone out.
> Too bad if you and I are one of them.
> 
> I want it that way. I don't like backdoors unless I created them
> on purpose.

If the community has no issue with retaining 0 SET-ORDER then the 
standard's wording should be revised to say that the minimum search 
order is the empty search order, i.e. zero wordlists.

--
KM