Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: If Biden Loses Televised Debate, Can He Be Replaced?
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 20:56:20 -0700
Message-ID: <v5t9d6$19b6$1@solani.org>
References: <v5jusu$2pmlu$1@dont-email.me>
 <17dd712e093e033e$4759$3767249$10d55a65@news.newsdemon.com>
 <vwSdnaUXHeafQBz7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vjn38jp2gpse1essga7hbglilult4tnfu4@4ax.com>
 <PCudncK6nb8Ofxz7nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <39p38jhnhvj2mjdj49e7ca4v97fpfd8in4@4ax.com>
 <IQydnduIEa-YdBz7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <6j748j91cj94cs9t35eipapqd3ucaltjbt@4ax.com>
 <atropos-68FBCD.20401930062024@news.giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 03:56:22 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="42342"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.2.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WFXpfqn+jV6USjfD++qIc2jbQUs=
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXREqRcybS/09YEk5jJxhEKNR5fUqDNMnIxXe99ZV3TM/ZJWzgrZoje/kDMBERqQ==
In-Reply-To: <atropos-68FBCD.20401930062024@news.giganews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4723
Lines: 73

On 6/30/2024 8:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> In article <6j748j91cj94cs9t35eipapqd3ucaltjbt@4ax.com>,
>   shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 23:23:49 +0000, BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:56:19 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 30, 2024 at 3:40:41 PM PDT, "shawn"
>>>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:32:34 +0000, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jun 29, 2024 at 2:57:55 AM PDT, "trotsky" <gmsingh@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/28/24 10:49 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <i18t7jdt9idsgamt2nrt6dctolugp38s76@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>>>> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:01:49 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Earlier this month, Business Insider offered these possible
>>>>>>>>>>> replacements for Biden should he not be the nominee: Kamala
>>>>>>>>>>> Harris, governors Gavin Newsom (D-CA), Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI),
>>>>>>>>>>> Roy Cooper (D-N.C.), and Wes Moore (D-MD), and senators Amy
>>>>>>>>>>> Klobuchar (D-MN) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The knives are out already.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gavvy Newsom and Hillary were probably watching the debate from their
>>>>>>>>> respective lairs and whispering "Excellent" over their tented fingers
>>>>>>>>> in their best Monty Burns voice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What did they say after your guy Trump claimed (again) that Dems want
>>>>>>>> to kill babies after they're born?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leftists like Hutt are calling what Trump said about "post-birth"
>>>>>>> abortions and Ralph Northam a lie. Here's then-governor of Virginia
>>>>>>> Northam in his own words. You tell me what he's talking about if
>>>>>>> Trump was lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So that one guy represents all Dems?
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump specifically said Northam wanted post-birth abortions. Leftists
>>>>> went nuts and said that was a lie.
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's a lie, what is Northam talking about there?
>>>>
>>>> My point is Trump keeps saying Democrats want post-birth abortions.
>>>> It's not Democrats, but at most one Democrat that said such a thing.
>>>
>>> Gavvy Newsom has also made similar remarks. He's talked about amending the
>>> California penal code so that such post-birth abortions won't fall under
>>> the definition of murder, which killing a living baby outside the womb most
>>> certainly is.
>>
>> If the doctors, and the mother think a baby isn't viable is it really
>> that wrong to terminate the baby's life? That's not an abortion. It's
>> the so called mercy killing but one that is or should be done within
>> the law.
> 
> So it's okay to kill retarded people because they won't have a full life
> anyway and they'll just be burden on the parents?
> 
No, not 'retarded', but one who has physical problems that can't be 
fixed. One who will likely die anyway within a few weeks, and will be in 
great pain during that time.

A late term abortion isn't one that's performed just before full term, 
but one after 24 weeks. About 85% of abortions are before 12 weeks.