Article <v5ufo2$14agu$1@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v5ufo2$14agu$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<v5ufo2$14agu$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the
 semantics of the x86 language
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 09:50:42 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <v5ufo2$14agu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5tpi7$vsqr$3@dont-email.me>
 <v5u8g0$12udb$2@dont-email.me> <v5ueur$12qkb$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 16:50:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f83257e6e5a87f489aa8241c55498376";
	logging-data="1190430"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tbeeNxGtrObmFf4/WTpet"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lHFVsjOHYbmcL6ytJh9UTLKT6JA=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v5ueur$12qkb$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2955

On 7/1/2024 9:37 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 01.jul.2024 om 14:46 schreef olcott:
>> On 7/1/2024 3:32 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>
>> _DDD()
>> [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>> [00002183] c3               ret
>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>
>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an
>> emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted.
>> Once aborted the DDD emulated by HHH immediately stops.
>>
>> At no point in this emulation does the call from DDD
>> correctly emulated by HHH to HHH(DDD) ever return.
>>
>> You can understand this or fail to understand this
>> disagreement is flat out incorrect.
> 
> I understand it, but that does not contradict that the abort is one 
> cycle too soon, which makes it incorrect.

On 7/1/2024 9:27 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
 > Not aborting will loop infinitely.

That you disagree with your own self proves that you are wrong.

If it is ever the case that
 > Not aborting will loop infinitely.
THIS PROVES THAT ABORTING IS NECESSARILY CORRECT

     If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
     until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
     stop running unless aborted then

IT IS 100% COMPLETELY CORRECT TO ABORT

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer