Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:52:19 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v5ujbj$1na1q$2@i2pn2.org>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v5cn01$149dc$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5ebvr$1hs89$1@dont-email.me> <v5efod$1ikpr$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5ejau$1iq57$1@dont-email.me> <v5eup8$1lar1$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5f1nm$1lp16$1@dont-email.me> <v5f246$1m2fl$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5f3fg$1lp16$2@dont-email.me> <v5f3j8$1m2fl$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5f54f$1lp16$3@dont-email.me> <v5f5sd$1mcif$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5ght9$21jrt$1@dont-email.me> <v5h558$24jbd$7@dont-email.me>
	<v5jcas$2m18t$2@dont-email.me> <v5k7ju$2qsdr$5@dont-email.me>
	<v5mcvo$1cgj0$3@i2pn2.org> <v5mklg$3cibm$7@dont-email.me>
	<v5mo8a$1d3t3$2@i2pn2.org> <v5mqge$3e4fd$2@dont-email.me>
	<v5msjt$1d3t3$9@i2pn2.org> <v5mtba$3elj0$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5n2ah$1d3t3$10@i2pn2.org> <v5n2sk$3fm1k$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5po6i$1h5u1$1@i2pn2.org> <v5pp9m$2jk8$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5r5p4$1irrf$1@i2pn2.org> <v5s4f4$jvgt$3@dont-email.me>
	<v5tp92$vsqr$2@dont-email.me> <v5u94l$12udb$5@dont-email.me>
	<v5uec2$12qkb$2@dont-email.me> <v5uesa$145ld$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:52:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1812538"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2744
Lines: 20

Am Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:35:54 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 7/1/2024 9:27 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 01.jul.2024 om 14:57 schreef olcott:
>>> On 7/1/2024 3:27 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 30.jun.2024 om 19:25 schreef olcott:
>>>>> On 6/30/2024 3:42 AM, joes wrote:

>>> Unless the outer HHH aborts its simulation after some fixed number of
>>> correct emulations or none of the HHH ever aborts and HHH never stops
>>> running.
>> But that does not make the result of the abort correct.
>> Not aborting will loop infinitely.
>      If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D until
>      H correctly determines that its simulated D would never stop
>      running unless aborted
If. D does stop running though, because the H that it calls aborts the
recursive emulation in order to be a decider.

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.