Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: olcott is still disagreeing with the semantics of simulation
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:57:58 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v5ujm6$1na1q$3@i2pn2.org>
References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me>
	<v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5sbpt$1kfbr$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sjsa$msl0$1@dont-email.me> <v5skc9$1kfbr$7@i2pn2.org>
	<v5smuk$n7a2$1@dont-email.me> <v5sorr$1kfbr$10@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sp4v$nnko$1@dont-email.me> <v5sr4t$1kfbq$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v5srjn$o1o0$1@dont-email.me> <v5ssaq$1kfbq$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v5st66$o7ss$1@dont-email.me> <v5su4q$1kfbr$11@i2pn2.org>
	<v5sv8o$ogo5$1@dont-email.me> <v5t0h8$1kfbr$12@i2pn2.org>
	<v5t1af$omq9$1@dont-email.me> <v5t3h4$1kfbr$13@i2pn2.org>
	<v5t470$t0hj$1@dont-email.me> <v5u2o5$1mj7k$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v5u8li$12udb$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:57:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1812538"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2768
Lines: 30

Am Mon, 01 Jul 2024 07:49:54 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 7/1/2024 6:08 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 6/30/24 10:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 6/30/2024 9:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 6/30/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 6/30/2024 8:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/30/24 9:03 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 6/30/2024 7:44 PM, Richard
>>>>>> Damon wrote:

>>>>>>> The call from DDD to HHH(DDD) when N steps of DDD are correctly
>>>>>>> emulated by any pure function x86 emulator HHH at machine address
>>>>>>> 0000217a cannot possibly return.
>>>>>> But that is NOT the "behavior of the input", and CAN NOT BE SO
>>>>>> DEFINED.

>>>>> DDD is  emulated by HHH which calls an emulated HHH(DDD) to
>>>>> repeat the process until aborted.
>>>> And, since the HHH that DDD calls will abort is emulation, it WILL
>>>> return to DDD and it will return also.
Right.

>> The emulation stops, and the emulating behavor of HHH stops, but not
>> the behavior of the input.
> When DDD is no longer being emulated all of its behavior stops. DDD is
> the input.
Again: emulating does not change what the input does of its own. Aborting
an emulation is premature, as the input does not contain an abort.

-- 
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott:
Objectively I am a genius.