Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v5v48d$17jjv$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Does the number of nines increase? Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 13:40:44 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: <v5v48d$17jjv$2@dont-email.me> References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <v5jm70$2o1ji$1@dont-email.me> <7IOaykTbfjXdA1AMOzAEFksmqwU@jntp> <v5kuka$1as01$1@i2pn2.org> <ZFlyaJ5FGPIRVx6UhPZ2H8N3onc@jntp> <v5nd52$3hovk$1@dont-email.me> <D69QMt7Sl70ByIgZ0qdtdfSA7FQ@jntp> <v5ptn8$1h5u1$14@i2pn2.org> <MdvejrKaIhrONe7iiLdSBVOzqDc@jntp> <0798c018-2943-4b3d-bc76-493318250573@att.net> <Pf1h3uCWtJY3FQs30VPLl22cE0Y@jntp> <v5ull2$15fmf$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 22:40:46 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c8b7d5aa38b15ca915d71f715c1f944"; logging-data="1298047"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19YAz94jxIaJd6xUQaKZjM1L1HjmdyN8XI=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:yFKD5+TBqCeDlCVtbxM/VOeIl8s= In-Reply-To: <v5ull2$15fmf$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2483 On 7/1/2024 9:31 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 7/1/2024 9:10 AM, WM wrote: >> Le 30/06/2024 à 20:10, Jim Burns a écrit : >>> On 6/30/2024 11:15 AM, WM wrote: >>>> Le 29/06/2024 à 23:18, joes a écrit : >>>>> Am Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:01:10 +0000 schrieb WM: >>> >>>>>> Like "0.111..." it is a formula. >>>>>> Formulas determine sequences. >>>>>> The other way round is not possible. >>>> >>>>> Then all real numbers are formulas. >>>> >>>> Yes, you got it! >>> >>> Then there are more formulas than there are formulas. >> >> Of course. All constructed finite formulas belong to a potentially >> infinite collection. > > .6 is finite > .66 is finite > .666 is finite > .(6) is infinite ..666... = .(6) = 2/3 > > :^) > > >>> >>> So, there is a point there. >>> So, there is a formula there. >>> But there isn't an indexed.formula there. >>> So, all the indexed.formulas >>> (finite strings, finite alphabet) >>> aren't all the formulas. >>> Somehow. >> >> Yes. There is no absolute "all" in potential infinity. >> >> Regards, WM >> >