Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 20:39:32 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <v5vlok$1b0k9$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v4vrfg$2793f$1@dont-email.me> <v5chru$10816$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v5cn01$149dc$1@dont-email.me> <v5ebvr$1hs89$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5efod$1ikpr$1@dont-email.me> <v5ejau$1iq57$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5eup8$1lar1$2@dont-email.me> <v5f1nm$1lp16$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5f246$1m2fl$1@dont-email.me> <v5f3fg$1lp16$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5f3j8$1m2fl$2@dont-email.me> <v5f54f$1lp16$3@dont-email.me>
 <v5f5sd$1mcif$1@dont-email.me> <v5ght9$21jrt$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5h558$24jbd$7@dont-email.me> <v5jcas$2m18t$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5k7ju$2qsdr$5@dont-email.me> <v5mcvo$1cgj0$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v5mklg$3cibm$7@dont-email.me> <v5mo8a$1d3t3$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v5mqge$3e4fd$2@dont-email.me> <v5msjt$1d3t3$9@i2pn2.org>
 <v5mtba$3elj0$1@dont-email.me> <v5n2ah$1d3t3$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v5n2sk$3fm1k$1@dont-email.me> <v5po6i$1h5u1$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v5pp9m$2jk8$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5p4$1irrf$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v5s4f4$jvgt$3@dont-email.me> <v5tp92$vsqr$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5u94l$12udb$5@dont-email.me> <v5vi68$1oanb$4@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 03:39:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="be8a74d1ebb79f081dc40b5f7175e5aa";
	logging-data="1409673"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+kHSLzkbWYGJRSaEDi38Am"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6bbInYOnovzde0kQDGc+MWl3mdo=
In-Reply-To: <v5vi68$1oanb$4@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3482

On 7/1/2024 7:38 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 7/1/24 8:57 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 7/1/2024 3:27 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 30.jun.2024 om 19:25 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 6/30/2024 3:42 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, I mean: why does the inner simulator repeat instead of aborting,
>>>>> the same as the outer one does?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Technically it is called detecting a repeating state.
>>>>> Yeah, I know. My point is: all recursive calls both enter and detect
>>>>> a repeating state.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The inner ones always see one less execution trace
>>>> than the next outer one, thus could only meet their
>>>> abort criteria after they have already been aborted.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Which indicates that they were aborted too soon, showing that the 
>>> emulation was incorrect.
>>
>> Unless the outer HHH aborts its simulation after some
>> fixed number of correct emulations or none of the HHH
>> ever aborts and HHH never stops running.
> 
> But the outer HHH DOES abort its simulation, since you have said it did 
> (and it either does or it doesn't).
> 
> That means that the simulation of DDD stops, but not the behavior of the 
> machine that it is simulating.
> 

x86 code remains a static string and thus not a dynamic process
when it is no longer simulated. If you never heard of those two
terms before then you do not have the equivalent of a BSCS.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer