Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 22:55:12 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <v62i31$21b7a$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me> <v60dci$1ib5p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v60red$1kr1q$2@dont-email.me> <v61hn7$1oec9$1@dont-email.me>
 <v61ipa$1og2o$2@dont-email.me> <v61jod$1oec9$2@dont-email.me>
 <v61leu$1p1uo$1@dont-email.me>
 <dd109397687b2f8e74c3e1e3d826772db8b65e40@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 05:55:13 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29a678b7ecb7074967021c8dcb9f1179";
	logging-data="2141418"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19rLIgMGIjW6VbT0vR0ZNKQ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:iDgxCVBDiMmSuo6Mkm8I/vUYCG0=
In-Reply-To: <dd109397687b2f8e74c3e1e3d826772db8b65e40@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3223

On 7/2/2024 10:50 PM, joes wrote:
> Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:46:38 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 7/2/2024 2:17 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 02.jul.2024 om 21:00 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 7/2/2024 1:42 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 02.jul.2024 om 14:22 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> On 7/2/2024 3:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>> Op 02.jul.2024 om 03:25 schreef olcott:
> 
>>>>>>>> Every C programmer that knows what an x86 emulator is knows that
>>>>>>>> when HHH emulates the machine language of Infinite_Loop,
>>>>>>>> Infinite_Recursion, and DDD that it must abort these emulations so
>>>>>>>> that itself can terminate normally.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whether or not it *must* abort is not very relevant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This <is> the problem that I am willing to discuss.
>>>>>> I am unwilling to discuss any other problem.
>>>>>> This does meet the Sipser approved criteria.
> 
>>>>> Repeating the same thing that has already been proved to be
>>>>> irrelevant does not bring the discussion any further.
>>>>> Sipser is not relevant, because that is about a correct simulation.
>>>>> Your simulation is not correct.
>>>>>
>>>> If you disagree with this you are either dishonest or clueless I no
>>>> longer care which one.
> 
>>>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an emulated HHH(DDD) to
>>>> repeat the process until aborted.
>>>
>>> HHH repeats the process twice and aborts too soon.
>>
>> You are freaking thinking too damn narrow minded.
>> DDD is correctly emulated by any HHH that can exist which calls this
>> emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted (which may be
>> never).
> Whatever HHH does, it does not run forever but aborts.
> 

HHH halts on input DDD.

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
}

DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly halt.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer