Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v63i40$26moh$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Antonio Marques <no_email@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.lang,alt.usage.english Subject: Re: "a Pair of Panties" ????? Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:01:52 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: <v63i40$26moh$1@dont-email.me> References: <v5t8mv$tk1f$1@dont-email.me> <v5tgf1$ukmm$1@dont-email.me> <v5tmc2$vf80$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 15:01:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c02f0e6724af03f1fed02e6c6329b9ff"; logging-data="2317073"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5bBvoJSeN3LrOE2HpsPfitIHvYaeMbmcDKe6QgoRXmA==" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3cBgEGPzMnmQ5Fi4ZgQVj2LqVVg= sha1:JH4TJujIlreMrrWldtWcQ5OZz2w= Bytes: 1545 Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > 'Panties' for menswear goes back to ~1845 ("now > rare"), for women's underpants to ~1904. > > "As she laid herself out to stride, the other fellows used to get a fine > exhibition of absolutely naked girl from the waist down (for panties > were the rare exception, and not the rule then)" - 'Sydney Sportsman', > 1904/08/24. > To when may the use of 'naked girl' as a mass noun go back?