Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v63nvl$27mh1$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: Wifi status indicator Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 15:41:57 +0100 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 26 Message-ID: <v63nvl$27mh1$1@dont-email.me> References: <v5uu9p$16mt1$1@dont-email.me> <v5vaq4$11sto$1@dont-email.me> <slrnv884rq.3c14.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <v61m09$1osev$3@dont-email.me> <slrnv8ao5u.4een.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 16:41:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="50070a0ed1093c8b556ef6f57c4d3ad2"; logging-data="2349601"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Br6j7jxhTEO6NGyurMMoN15odG0D4FYw=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:+PXuEBtg6RBVe0gwxGIsoD+BFSg= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <slrnv8ao5u.4een.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> Bytes: 2196 On 03/07/2024 15:40, candycanearter07 wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote at 19:55 this Tuesday (GMT): >> On 02/07/2024 15:50, candycanearter07 wrote: >> >>> >>> Don't wifi connections change which channels they use frequently? Unless >>> you control all the nearby routers, I don't think it would help a ton.. >> >> No. They dont. You assign a (centre) channel to a wifi station. I t >> spreads a lot either side, but the centre is the centre > > > Weird, maybe it was just the corporate wifi that did that.. Now THAT I can believe. Having sat in a hospital with over 40 different WIFI points all with different SSIDS...spread fairly evenly over the spectrum... I cant see NHS staff doing any setup and contractors probly send in a PFY. -- “It is hard to imagine a more stupid decision or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.” Thomas Sowell