Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be
 willfully ignorant
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:53:22 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <v63s5i$28dpi$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me> <v60dci$1ib5p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v60red$1kr1q$2@dont-email.me> <v61hn7$1oec9$1@dont-email.me>
 <v61ipa$1og2o$2@dont-email.me> <v61jod$1oec9$2@dont-email.me>
 <v61leu$1p1uo$1@dont-email.me>
 <7b6a00827bfcc84e99e19a0d0ae6028ebcdc263c@i2pn2.org>
 <v620vu$1qutj$2@dont-email.me>
 <f6e8f5de9a1e61c7970a92145ce8c1f9087ba431@i2pn2.org>
 <v628ts$1s632$1@dont-email.me>
 <178edf6a7c5329df35a9af6852ecbd41c0948ea1@i2pn2.org>
 <v629mp$1s632$3@dont-email.me>
 <168858894febbaa529d1704ea864bbe15cb8f635@i2pn2.org>
 <v62bgv$1s632$6@dont-email.me>
 <211a07c98d1fc183ed3e6c079ec1e883dd45f1cc@i2pn2.org>
 <v62f92$20moo$3@dont-email.me> <v632cm$23ohm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v63jbh$26loi$5@dont-email.me> <v63rld$24jon$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 17:53:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29a678b7ecb7074967021c8dcb9f1179";
	logging-data="2373426"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mdo1vfhDURvRtRR/4lBHO"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:M02pPvv4AoSVRf660lhlG/5HAU8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v63rld$24jon$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4741

On 7/3/2024 10:44 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 03.jul.2024 om 15:22 schreef olcott:
>> On 7/3/2024 3:33 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 05:07 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 7/2/2024 9:35 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 7/2/24 10:03 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/2/2024 8:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/2/24 9:32 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/2/2024 8:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/2/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Professor Sipser probably does understand the x86 language.
>>>>>>>>>> Shared-memory implementation of the Karp-Sipser
>>>>>>>>>> kernelization process
>>>>>>>>>> https://inria.hal.science/hal-03404798/file/hipc2021.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And the x86 language says the same thing,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> YOU are just a liar, as proved by the fact that you can not 
>>>>>>>>> give the Diagonalization proof you claimed you had.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry, you are just too stupid to understand.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You continue to assume that you can simply disagree
>>>>>>>> with the x86 language. My memory was refreshed that
>>>>>>>> called you stupid would be a sin according to Christ.
>>>>>>>> I really want to do the best I can to repent.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But I am NOT disagreeing with the x86 language.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you point out what fact of it I am disagreing about it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You keep trying to get away with saying that the simulation is
>>>>>> incorrect when the semantics of the x86 language conclusively
>>>>>> proves that it is correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, and x86n emulation is only fully correct if it continues to 
>>>>> the final end. 
>>>>
>>>> void Infinite_Loop()
>>>> {
>>>>    HERE: goto HERE;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Why do you say such ridiculously stupid things that you are are false?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your Infinite_Loop does not apply. For a two cycle recursive simulation
>>>
>>
>> This says nothing about two cycles nitwit.
>>
>> _DDD()
>> [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>> [00002183] c3               ret
>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>
>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an
>> emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted.
>>
>>
> 
> You told us that HHH aborts its simulation after two cycles. 

The above HHH refers to every pure function that correctly
emulates one of more steps of DDD.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer