Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant --- AKA is Fred a Liar ?
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:21:53 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 83
Message-ID: <v644s1$29t4h$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me>
 <211a07c98d1fc183ed3e6c079ec1e883dd45f1cc@i2pn2.org>
 <v62f92$20moo$3@dont-email.me>
 <623debd817e63a256100bb15fed3af8d4fb969fe@i2pn2.org>
 <v62hc7$20moo$6@dont-email.me>
 <e3c734b6a1ce3386210f7700bf03d183334d4d55@i2pn2.org>
 <v63jkc$26loi$7@dont-email.me>
 <0600a243a3bb843ec505712dc7746d41e0ca66dc@i2pn2.org>
 <v63n8u$27f1a$3@dont-email.me> <v63rd7$24jon$1@dont-email.me>
 <v63s2c$28dpi$1@dont-email.me> <v63sq3$28goi$4@dont-email.me>
 <v63t32$28dpi$5@dont-email.me> <v63tjq$23vu$1@news.muc.de>
 <v63tve$28dpi$9@dont-email.me> <v643lb$29pc5$4@dont-email.me>
 <v643rs$29t4h$2@dont-email.me> <v644ou$29pag$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 20:21:54 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29a678b7ecb7074967021c8dcb9f1179";
	logging-data="2421905"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5I/WUN0qdQQGpyz2e5Gne"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zK4zKWfLrLSPaL6Bxl6eBUXNG6U=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v644ou$29pag$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4687

On 7/3/2024 1:20 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 03.jul.2024 om 20:04 schreef olcott:
>> On 7/3/2024 1:01 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 18:24 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 7/3/2024 11:18 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/3/2024 11:04 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 17:51 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>> On 7/3/2024 10:40 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ .... ]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>>>>>>> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>>>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>>>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>>>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>>>>>>>>> [00002182] 5d         pop ebp
>>>>>>>>>> [00002183] c3         ret
>>>>>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *This is the repeating state*
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But not an *infinitely* repeating state.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The criteria that I spent two years writing and the best selling
>>>>>>>> author of theory of computation textbooks agrees with says nothing
>>>>>>>> about *infinitely* repeating state.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Irrelevant, because that is about a correct simulation. Your 
>>>>>>> simulation
>>>>>>> is incorrect, so Sipser does not apply here.
>>>>>
>>>>>> OK you are a liar then.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think so.  There is only one liar on this newsgroup, and 
>>>>> it's not
>>>>> Fred.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *A liar is anyone that denies this*
>>>
>>> Another display of lack of correct reasoning.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> _DDD()
>>>> [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>>>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>>>> [00002183] c3               ret
>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>
>>>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an emulated HHH(DDD) to 
>>>> repeat this process until the emulated DDD is aborted.
>>>
>>> I proved that HHH cannot possibly correctly simulate itself.
>>
>> Liar
>> https://liarparadox.org/HHH(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf
> 
> Your trace confirms my proof.
> The full trace shows that the simulation of the simulator is unable to 
> reach the simulation of the 'ret' of the simulated simulator.

Liar

> This is further evidence that the ad hominem attack is only used to hide 
> a lack of argumentation.
> 
>>
>>> You are unable to show the error in the proof.
>>> If you then repeat 'correctly', who is ignoring the truth?
>>>
>>

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer