Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the
 semantics of the x86 language
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:37:03 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <v645of$29t4h$6@dont-email.me>
References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5tgvj$utcb$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5u8c9$12udb$1@dont-email.me> <v608ft$1hqo6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v61hoo$1og2o$1@dont-email.me> <v61k27$1oec9$3@dont-email.me>
 <v61li2$1p1uo$2@dont-email.me> <v63205$23ohl$1@dont-email.me>
 <v63j94$26loi$4@dont-email.me> <v63sh7$28goi$3@dont-email.me>
 <v63soh$28dpi$4@dont-email.me> <v64327$29pc5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v643gd$29t4h$1@dont-email.me> <v6452f$29pag$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 20:37:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29a678b7ecb7074967021c8dcb9f1179";
	logging-data="2421905"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Bj75zY9VhDV8SV3TS3ULs"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:L+I8dilpJGDZ7qwo5LeY9VvgSew=
In-Reply-To: <v6452f$29pag$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3306

On 7/3/2024 1:25 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 03.jul.2024 om 19:58 schreef olcott:
>> On 7/3/2024 12:51 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 18:03 schreef olcott:
>>>>
>>
>> _DDD()
>> [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>> [00002183] c3               ret
>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>
>>>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an emulated HHH(DDD)
>>>> to repeat this process an endless number of times until aborted
>>>> or out-of-memory error.
>>> Anyone knowing the x86 language knows that a program cannot be 
>>> programmed to do two different things
>>> It cannot do both run out of memory *and* abort.
>>
>> DDD correctly emulated by any element of the infinite
>> set of every pure function HHH cannot possibly reach
>> its own ret instruction and halt. 
> 
> Exactly! Well done! This proves that HHH cannot possibly correctly 
> simulate itself. If it aborts, it does so one cycle too soon.
> 

My system of reasoning could be used to make a chatbot
that would make all the propagandists look foolish even
to themselves. The alternative is the destruction of the
planet to earn a couple of more bucks.

This is not some little game that can be played for
trollish sadism. It has consequences.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer