| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v6469t$29pag$5@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 20:46:20 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 44 Message-ID: <v6469t$29pag$5@dont-email.me> References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me> <v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5tgvj$utcb$1@dont-email.me> <v5u8c9$12udb$1@dont-email.me> <v608ft$1hqo6$1@dont-email.me> <v61hoo$1og2o$1@dont-email.me> <v61k27$1oec9$3@dont-email.me> <v61li2$1p1uo$2@dont-email.me> <v63205$23ohl$1@dont-email.me> <v63j94$26loi$4@dont-email.me> <v63sh7$28goi$3@dont-email.me> <v63soh$28dpi$4@dont-email.me> <v64327$29pc5$1@dont-email.me> <v643gd$29t4h$1@dont-email.me> <v6452f$29pag$2@dont-email.me> <v645of$29t4h$6@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 20:46:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6cedb142f34e03a5852de86ea322d5ac"; logging-data="2418000"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+g2BdDWDsTcVoEi6D0ITqH" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:tQGmllNcYftufJUjdx7Yuli/qYs= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <v645of$29t4h$6@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3539 Op 03.jul.2024 om 20:37 schreef olcott: > On 7/3/2024 1:25 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >> Op 03.jul.2024 om 19:58 schreef olcott: >>> On 7/3/2024 12:51 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 18:03 schreef olcott: >>>>> >>> >>> _DDD() >>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD) >>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >>> [00002183] c3 ret >>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >>> >>>>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an emulated HHH(DDD) >>>>> to repeat this process an endless number of times until aborted >>>>> or out-of-memory error. >>>> Anyone knowing the x86 language knows that a program cannot be >>>> programmed to do two different things >>>> It cannot do both run out of memory *and* abort. >>> >>> DDD correctly emulated by any element of the infinite >>> set of every pure function HHH cannot possibly reach >>> its own ret instruction and halt. >> >> Exactly! Well done! This proves that HHH cannot possibly correctly >> simulate itself. If it aborts, it does so one cycle too soon. >> > > My system of reasoning could be used to make a chatbot > that would make all the propagandists look foolish even > to themselves. The alternative is the destruction of the > planet to earn a couple of more bucks. > > This is not some little game that can be played for > trollish sadism. It has consequences. > I appreciate this motivation, but it does not help to make the simulation correct. Better try something that can help, instead of spoiling your time with something that does not work as you expected.