Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v6473e$2agfo$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:59:57 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 52 Message-ID: <v6473e$2agfo$2@dont-email.me> References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me> <v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5tgvj$utcb$1@dont-email.me> <v5u8c9$12udb$1@dont-email.me> <v608ft$1hqo6$1@dont-email.me> <v61hoo$1og2o$1@dont-email.me> <v61k27$1oec9$3@dont-email.me> <v61li2$1p1uo$2@dont-email.me> <v63205$23ohl$1@dont-email.me> <v63j94$26loi$4@dont-email.me> <v63sh7$28goi$3@dont-email.me> <v63soh$28dpi$4@dont-email.me> <v64327$29pc5$1@dont-email.me> <v643gd$29t4h$1@dont-email.me> <v6452f$29pag$2@dont-email.me> <v645of$29t4h$6@dont-email.me> <v6469t$29pag$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 20:59:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29a678b7ecb7074967021c8dcb9f1179"; logging-data="2441720"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7QQBb5y2Cq7Pafd54/HTN" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:FYgseWZWoOC33FYkHmOBSnlGO5w= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v6469t$29pag$5@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3784 On 7/3/2024 1:46 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: > Op 03.jul.2024 om 20:37 schreef olcott: >> On 7/3/2024 1:25 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 19:58 schreef olcott: >>>> On 7/3/2024 12:51 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 18:03 schreef olcott: >>>>>> >>>> >>>> _DDD() >>>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD) >>>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >>>> [00002183] c3 ret >>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >>>> >>>>>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an emulated HHH(DDD) >>>>>> to repeat this process an endless number of times until aborted >>>>>> or out-of-memory error. >>>>> Anyone knowing the x86 language knows that a program cannot be >>>>> programmed to do two different things >>>>> It cannot do both run out of memory *and* abort. >>>> >>>> DDD correctly emulated by any element of the infinite >>>> set of every pure function HHH cannot possibly reach >>>> its own ret instruction and halt. >>> >>> Exactly! Well done! This proves that HHH cannot possibly correctly >>> simulate itself. If it aborts, it does so one cycle too soon. >>> >> >> My system of reasoning could be used to make a chatbot >> that would make all the propagandists look foolish even >> to themselves. The alternative is the destruction of the >> planet to earn a couple of more bucks. >> >> This is not some little game that can be played for >> trollish sadism. It has consequences. >> > > I appreciate this motivation, but it does not help to make the > simulation correct. Better try something that can help, instead of > spoiling your time with something that does not work as you expected. That you lie about how it works does not mean it doesn't work. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer