Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v648f2$2ape0$2@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v648f2$2ape0$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the
 semantics of the x86 language
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:23:14 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <v648f2$2ape0$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5tgvj$utcb$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5u8c9$12udb$1@dont-email.me> <v608ft$1hqo6$1@dont-email.me>
 <v61hoo$1og2o$1@dont-email.me> <v61k27$1oec9$3@dont-email.me>
 <v61li2$1p1uo$2@dont-email.me> <v63205$23ohl$1@dont-email.me>
 <v63j94$26loi$4@dont-email.me> <v63sh7$28goi$3@dont-email.me>
 <v63soh$28dpi$4@dont-email.me> <v64327$29pc5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v643gd$29t4h$1@dont-email.me> <v6452f$29pag$2@dont-email.me>
 <v645of$29t4h$6@dont-email.me> <v6469t$29pag$5@dont-email.me>
 <v6473e$2agfo$2@dont-email.me> <v6480p$29pag$7@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 21:23:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29a678b7ecb7074967021c8dcb9f1179";
	logging-data="2450880"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19G2yGXw7uAwTBa7KpJW7WY"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wNT5NE0s0CL3MOnLbfmNZfbyWdk=
In-Reply-To: <v6480p$29pag$7@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4576

On 7/3/2024 2:15 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 03.jul.2024 om 20:59 schreef olcott:
>> On 7/3/2024 1:46 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 20:37 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 7/3/2024 1:25 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 19:58 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> On 7/3/2024 12:51 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 18:03 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>>> [00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
>>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
>>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
>>>>>> [00002182] 5d               pop ebp
>>>>>> [00002183] c3               ret
>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an emulated HHH(DDD)
>>>>>>>> to repeat this process an endless number of times until aborted
>>>>>>>> or out-of-memory error.
>>>>>>> Anyone knowing the x86 language knows that a program cannot be 
>>>>>>> programmed to do two different things
>>>>>>> It cannot do both run out of memory *and* abort.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DDD correctly emulated by any element of the infinite
>>>>>> set of every pure function HHH cannot possibly reach
>>>>>> its own ret instruction and halt. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly! Well done! This proves that HHH cannot possibly correctly 
>>>>> simulate itself. If it aborts, it does so one cycle too soon.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My system of reasoning could be used to make a chatbot
>>>> that would make all the propagandists look foolish even
>>>> to themselves. The alternative is the destruction of the
>>>> planet to earn a couple of more bucks.
>>>>
>>>> This is not some little game that can be played for
>>>> trollish sadism. It has consequences.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I appreciate this motivation, but it does not help to make the 
>>> simulation correct. Better try something that can help, instead of 
>>> spoiling your time with something that does not work as you expected.
>>
>> That you lie about how it works does not mean it doesn't work.
>>
> 
> You are too soon with the words lie and liar. It does not contribute to 
> a honest discussion.
> That you hope that it works, does not mean that it works, even when your 
> hope is based on an appreciated motivation.

You are essentially disagreeing with arithmetic.
There is an arithmetic to the meaning of words
and to the behavior of x86 code.

When I say 2 + 3 = 5 you are not free to disagree
without big a liar. As soon as you disagree THAT MAKES YOU A LIAR

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer