Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v648f2$2ape0$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:23:14 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 67 Message-ID: <v648f2$2ape0$2@dont-email.me> References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me> <v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5tgvj$utcb$1@dont-email.me> <v5u8c9$12udb$1@dont-email.me> <v608ft$1hqo6$1@dont-email.me> <v61hoo$1og2o$1@dont-email.me> <v61k27$1oec9$3@dont-email.me> <v61li2$1p1uo$2@dont-email.me> <v63205$23ohl$1@dont-email.me> <v63j94$26loi$4@dont-email.me> <v63sh7$28goi$3@dont-email.me> <v63soh$28dpi$4@dont-email.me> <v64327$29pc5$1@dont-email.me> <v643gd$29t4h$1@dont-email.me> <v6452f$29pag$2@dont-email.me> <v645of$29t4h$6@dont-email.me> <v6469t$29pag$5@dont-email.me> <v6473e$2agfo$2@dont-email.me> <v6480p$29pag$7@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 21:23:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29a678b7ecb7074967021c8dcb9f1179"; logging-data="2450880"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19G2yGXw7uAwTBa7KpJW7WY" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:wNT5NE0s0CL3MOnLbfmNZfbyWdk= In-Reply-To: <v6480p$29pag$7@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4576 On 7/3/2024 2:15 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: > Op 03.jul.2024 om 20:59 schreef olcott: >> On 7/3/2024 1:46 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 20:37 schreef olcott: >>>> On 7/3/2024 1:25 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 19:58 schreef olcott: >>>>>> On 7/3/2024 12:51 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 18:03 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _DDD() >>>>>> [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping >>>>>> [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping >>>>>> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD >>>>>> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD) >>>>>> [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>>> [00002182] 5d pop ebp >>>>>> [00002183] c3 ret >>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] >>>>>> >>>>>>>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an emulated HHH(DDD) >>>>>>>> to repeat this process an endless number of times until aborted >>>>>>>> or out-of-memory error. >>>>>>> Anyone knowing the x86 language knows that a program cannot be >>>>>>> programmed to do two different things >>>>>>> It cannot do both run out of memory *and* abort. >>>>>> >>>>>> DDD correctly emulated by any element of the infinite >>>>>> set of every pure function HHH cannot possibly reach >>>>>> its own ret instruction and halt. >>>>> >>>>> Exactly! Well done! This proves that HHH cannot possibly correctly >>>>> simulate itself. If it aborts, it does so one cycle too soon. >>>>> >>>> >>>> My system of reasoning could be used to make a chatbot >>>> that would make all the propagandists look foolish even >>>> to themselves. The alternative is the destruction of the >>>> planet to earn a couple of more bucks. >>>> >>>> This is not some little game that can be played for >>>> trollish sadism. It has consequences. >>>> >>> >>> I appreciate this motivation, but it does not help to make the >>> simulation correct. Better try something that can help, instead of >>> spoiling your time with something that does not work as you expected. >> >> That you lie about how it works does not mean it doesn't work. >> > > You are too soon with the words lie and liar. It does not contribute to > a honest discussion. > That you hope that it works, does not mean that it works, even when your > hope is based on an appreciated motivation. You are essentially disagreeing with arithmetic. There is an arithmetic to the meaning of words and to the behavior of x86 code. When I say 2 + 3 = 5 you are not free to disagree without big a liar. As soon as you disagree THAT MAKES YOU A LIAR -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer