Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v65eag$2l0vn$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:09:20 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 56 Message-ID: <v65eag$2l0vn$2@dont-email.me> References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me> <v606dn$1hg04$1@dont-email.me> <v60rb6$1kr1q$1@dont-email.me> <v62ugm$23ell$1@dont-email.me> <v63im2$26loi$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 08:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="047ceb361a67ca9992357286548f3fa6"; logging-data="2786295"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18L/foK+LLEa9AE6fw0XuQX" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:NMMpX3wEO49zzDcZlNdalfsGIKY= Bytes: 2526 On 2024-07-03 13:11:30 +0000, olcott said: > On 7/3/2024 2:27 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-07-02 12:20:54 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 7/2/2024 1:23 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2024-07-02 01:25:40 +0000, olcott said: >>>> >>>>> typedef void (*ptr)(); >>>>> int HHH(ptr P); >>>>> >>>>> void Infinite_Loop() >>>>> { >>>>> HERE: goto HERE; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> void Infinite_Recursion() >>>>> { >>>>> Infinite_Recursion(); >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> void DDD() >>>>> { >>>>> HHH(DDD); >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> int main() >>>>> { >>>>> HHH(Infinite_Loop); >>>>> HHH(Infinite_Recursion); >>>>> HHH(DDD); >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> Every C programmer that knows what an x86 emulator is knows >>>>> that when HHH emulates the machine language of Infinite_Loop, >>>>> Infinite_Recursion, and DDD that it must abort these emulations >>>>> so that itself can terminate normally. >>>> >>>> The "must" there is not quite correct. If the emulator does not abort >>>> then it will run forever or until the emulator is aborted by some >>>> external agent. That is not a problem unless there is an additional >>>> requirement, not specified above, that the emulator must terminate >>>> normally. >>> >>> This <is> the problem that I am willing to discuss. >> >> What is the problem you are willing to discuss? >> Are you willing to do anything else about to that problem? > > The part that you ignored. And still ignore as you failed to answer. -- Mikko