Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v65kcm$2lui5$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe... Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:52:53 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <v65kcm$2lui5$3@dont-email.me> References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me> <v60dci$1ib5p$1@dont-email.me> <v60red$1kr1q$2@dont-email.me> <v61hn7$1oec9$1@dont-email.me> <v61ipa$1og2o$2@dont-email.me> <v61jod$1oec9$2@dont-email.me> <v61leu$1p1uo$1@dont-email.me> <dd109397687b2f8e74c3e1e3d826772db8b65e40@i2pn2.org> <v62i31$21b7a$1@dont-email.me> <d593179ccad2eef1e84ab6eeddb0f255b2b386e5@i2pn2.org> <v63ml8$27f1a$2@dont-email.me> <1f93b46b7624427c02acebc57460bf5364a0bada@i2pn2.org> <v64r25$2e7d4$2@dont-email.me> <1f019b9b9aa0948c049e3351a0970975d83e8bbb@i2pn2.org> <v64to4$2egej$1@dont-email.me> <bc042961bf611736521a078e12ceb2d501756134@i2pn2.org> <v65021$2ipmk$1@dont-email.me> <439adc212e5f3d0900af35712c88813261a258bd@i2pn2.org> <v6524s$2itmh$1@dont-email.me> <928e876d154f43de2a345d562471a8c8844a1e19@i2pn2.org> <v654eu$2j8uu$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 09:52:54 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1c392df7964de9efb92f1d6ee392be3b"; logging-data="2816581"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+re/2C+zpYRqbPfoED8mfi" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:LXj7fR1BkFCFfutAAURFcVlSKLc= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <v654eu$2j8uu$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 3124 Op 04.jul.2024 om 05:21 schreef olcott: > On 7/3/2024 10:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 7/3/24 10:41 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 7/3/2024 9:34 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> On 7/3/24 10:05 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>> >>>>> You are not paying close enough attention to the exact words >>>>> that I am saying. DDD cannot possibly reach past its own >>>>> machine address 0000217a no matter what the Hell that HHH does. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> OF course it can. HHH might not be able to simulate it getting there, >>> >>> Because the machine instructions provided to HHH specify that >>> it is not possible to go there. HHH uses an x86 emulator with >>> two decades of development effort. >> >> No, the exact same instructions that HHH used when called by main are >> in the presentation to HHH by DDD, > > That is false and you are too indoctrinated to notice verified facts. > > HHH1 and directly executed DDD(DDD) benefit from > HHH(DDD) having already aborted its simulation. > HHH cannot possibly reap this same benefit. Exactly! Well done! This proves that HHH cannot possibly correctly simulate itself. Because it aborts too soon. > > Maybe I need to repeat this in every reply. > Yes and remember that, therefore, HHH cannot possibly correctly simulate itself.